2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-015-0405-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preventing eating disorders with an interactive gender-adapted intervention program in schools: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: BackgroundThere are a high number of adolescents who are at risk of developing an eating disorder. There is, therefore, a strong need to implement prevention programs aimed at reducing the incidence of eating disorders at this critical age. Among other factors, successful prevention programs have been shown to be interactive, carried out by professionals, focused on educational as well as psychosocial elements and have taken risk factors as well as resources into account. The objective of this study protocol i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although prevention programmes offered only to females have previously shown to be more effective [ 22 ], a programme that includes both sexes has several benefits, as Wiegel et al noted: “First, programs provided only for girls cannot be easily integrated into a typical school programme. Moreover, in spite of the lower prevalence of eating disorders in males, there is strong evidence that eating disorders burden boys in a similar way to girls” [ 23 ]. An intervention that addresses both males and females may also promote interaction between boys and girls, thereby helping both genders to see a wider picture when a between-gender misconceptions about attractiveness, thinness and muscularity are addressed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although prevention programmes offered only to females have previously shown to be more effective [ 22 ], a programme that includes both sexes has several benefits, as Wiegel et al noted: “First, programs provided only for girls cannot be easily integrated into a typical school programme. Moreover, in spite of the lower prevalence of eating disorders in males, there is strong evidence that eating disorders burden boys in a similar way to girls” [ 23 ]. An intervention that addresses both males and females may also promote interaction between boys and girls, thereby helping both genders to see a wider picture when a between-gender misconceptions about attractiveness, thinness and muscularity are addressed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El estudio con mayor tamaño muestral cuenta con un total de 1.848 participantes (Weigel et al, 2015), mientras que 81 es el tamaño de participantes menor (Rohde et al, 2014). La menor edad media de los de los sujetos es la del trabajo de Rohde et al (2014) con 12.1, y la más elevada es de 16,2 (Horney et al, 2015 Todos los programas pusieron de evidencia la eficacia de los programas cuando se compararon con el grupo control.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…El programa se mostró eficaz de cara a reducir el riesgo de aparición de los TA. Weigel et al (2015) llevaron a cabo una intervención de 3 sesiones de 90 minutos en dos semanas, y se trabajaban aspectos relacionados con factores de riesgo de los TA tales como el ideal de belleza para chicos y chicas, la imagen corporal, la influencia de los medios, la presión de la familia, etc. El programa contiene elementos interactivos y educativos, y permitió reducir la influencia de factores de riesgo en la aparición de TA.…”
Section: Instrumentos Utilizados En Los Diversos Programasunclassified
“…Davon kamen 20 Programme aus Deutschland, ein Programm aus Österreich [22] und ein Programm aus der Schweiz [23]. Als primärpräventive Programme wurden identifiziert: Aufklärung und Prävention [24,25], Body Talk [26], Bauchgefühl [27], Essenslust und Körperfrust [28], every Body [29], Healthy Teens @ School [22], Jugend mit Biss [30], MaiStep (Mainzer Schultraining zur Essstörungsprävention [31]), POPS (Potsdamer Prävention an Schulen [32]), PriMa (Primärprävention von Magersucht) [33][34][35][36], Student Bodies [37][38][39][40] [60]; Weight Concern in EDE-Q, [57]; Shape Concern in EDE-Q [57]), Depressivität (k = 2) (Beck Depression Inventar (BDI), [61]), Schlankheitsstreben (k = 10) (Drive for Thineness in EDI-2, [58]; Drive for Thinness in EDE-Q, [57]), (Körper-) Selbstwert (k = 10) (Fragebogen zur Beurteilung des eigenen Körpers (FBeK), [62]; Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), [63]; Self-Description-Questionaire (SDQ-III-G), [64]; State-Self-Esteem-Scale (SSED), [65]) und Wissen (k = 9) (Selbstentwickelte Skala zur Erfassung des Wissens zu AN, [35], Wissenstest, [66]; Fragebogen zu gesunder Ernährung und Essstörungen, [67]). [33,35], Torera [41,42], Trainingsprogramm an Schulen [43], Student Bodies [38]).…”
Section: üBersicht Der Programmeunclassified