2015
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201407129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CCM2–CCM3 interaction stabilizes their protein expression and permits endothelial network formation

Abstract: CCM2–CCM3 interactions protect CCM2 and CCM3 from proteasomal degradation, and both CCM2 and CCM3 are required for normal endothelial cell network formation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(86 reference statements)
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mutations and deletions were introduced by QuikChange (Agilent Technologies) mutagenesis or PCR amplification and subcloning into pEGFP (Takara Bio Inc.) or pLENTI-CMV-Hygro-GFP (Draheim et al, 2015) vectors. Cdc42 DNA was kindly provided by Brian Rosenberg (Yale University) and subcloned into pmCherry (in-house vector derived from pEGFP).…”
Section: Dna Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutations and deletions were introduced by QuikChange (Agilent Technologies) mutagenesis or PCR amplification and subcloning into pEGFP (Takara Bio Inc.) or pLENTI-CMV-Hygro-GFP (Draheim et al, 2015) vectors. Cdc42 DNA was kindly provided by Brian Rosenberg (Yale University) and subcloned into pmCherry (in-house vector derived from pEGFP).…”
Section: Dna Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on experimental and clinical data, CCM1-3 proteins are physically associated in order of CCM1-CCM2 and CCM2-CCM3, and the complex is required for correct protein localization at endothelial cell-cell junctions, vascular tubular and network stability as well as cell survival and proliferation [10, 21, 22]. In particular, CCM2-CCM3 interaction is indicated as maintaining stability of CCM3 and CCM2 proteins and protection from proteosomal degradation and normal endothelial cell network formation [10]. A recent proteomic study found that CCM3 in the STRIPAK complex established mutually exclusive interactions with PIP2A, germinal center kinases III (Stk24, Stk25, Mst4) and cortical actin binding protein 2 (CTTNBP2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may participate in regulating VEGFR2 receptor stability, PIP2A enzyme association with membrane phospholipids like PIP2 and PIP3, apoptosis and endothelial cell growth [9, 19, 21, 22, 27, 60]. CCM3 localization and molecular interaction in both complexes is considered critical for understanding CCM3 function, potential overlap between CCM2 and CCM3 pathology (due to CCM2 and CCM3 direct interaction) and differences from CCM1 and CCM2 pathways (RhoA, Cdc42 signaling and actin rearrangement) [10, 21, 66, 74]. How CCM3 regulate the TJ complex assembly and permeability, which target and signaling pathways are critical for development of CCM3 lesion is still awaits clarification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First described in focal adhesion kinase (FAK) (Arold et al, 2002;Hayashi et al, 2002), the compact four-helix bundle FAT domain was subsequently identified in the Cas-family of proteins (Arold et al, 2002;Garron et al, 2009;Mace et al, 2011), in the focal adhesion protein vinculin (Arold et al, 2002), in G protein-coupled receptor kinase-interacting protein ArfGAP 1 (GIT1) (Schmalzigaug et al, 2007) and more recently in cerebral cavernous malformation protein 3 (CCM3) (Li et al, 2010). The FAT domain mediates FAK interaction with paxillin (Hayashi et al, 2002;Hoellerer et al, 2003), FAK intra-molecular interactions (BramiCherrier et al, 2014), CCM3 interaction with CCM2 (Draheim et al, 2015), and interactions between the Cas-family proteins and members of the SH2-containing protein (NSP) family -NSP1, NSP2 (also known as AND-34 and BCAR3) and NSP3 (also known as SHEP1 and CHAT) (Garron et al, 2009;Mace et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%