2014
DOI: 10.14444/1007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Investigational Device Exemption Clinical Trial Comparing Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc to Anterior Discectomy and Fusion in the Treatment of Symptomatic Degenerative Disc Disease in the Cervical Spine

Abstract: BackgroundAnterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the gold standard for treating symptomatic cervical disc degeneration. Cervical total disc replacements (TDRs) have emerged as an alternative for some patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a new TDR device compared with ACDF for treating single-level cervical disc degeneration.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulated Investigational Dev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
75
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(40 reference statements)
2
75
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…21 The purpose of this study is to expand on results from the Mobi-C © Cervical Disc FDA IDE clinical trial with 7-year data. Previously reported 2- 13,22 , 4- 14,23 , and 5-year 24,25 follow-up results from this randomized clinical trial have shown equivalent or better performance of TDR compared to ACDF at both one and two levels of treatment. Here, we present 7-year results from the one and two level arms for a comprehensive, long-term evaluation of TDR with Mobi-C © .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…21 The purpose of this study is to expand on results from the Mobi-C © Cervical Disc FDA IDE clinical trial with 7-year data. Previously reported 2- 13,22 , 4- 14,23 , and 5-year 24,25 follow-up results from this randomized clinical trial have shown equivalent or better performance of TDR compared to ACDF at both one and two levels of treatment. Here, we present 7-year results from the one and two level arms for a comprehensive, long-term evaluation of TDR with Mobi-C © .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The study design, including patient selection criteria, randomization and surgical procedures, has previously been published in detail. 5 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] These studies have consistently found TDR to produce outcomes similar or superior to ACDF. There are a few studies with extended follow-up to five or more years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,18 The patient population included a total of 260 1-level and 339 2-level subjects randomized (2:1) to receive either TDR or ACDF treatment at 1 of 24 investigational sites. These 1-and 2-level results include 5 years of patient follow-up data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%