2015
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing the patterns of clonal selection in circulating tumor DNA from patients with colorectal cancer refractory to anti-EGFR treatment

Abstract: Newly detected KRAS and/or EGFR mutations in plasma ctDNA from patients refractory to anti-EGFR treatment appear to derive from rare, pre-existing clones in the primary tumors. These rare clones were associated with shorter PFS in patients receiving anti-EGFR treatment. Multiple simultaneous mutations in KRAS and EGFR in the ctDNA and the decline in allele frequency after discontinuation of anti-EGFR therapy in a subset of patients suggest that several resistance mechanisms can co-exist and that relative clona… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
203
1
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(30 reference statements)
19
203
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose was to demonstrate the presence of pre-existing mutated clones as mechanism of resistance to panitumumab. In contrast, Morelli et al recently measured the sums of lesion volumes measured (manually on each image, by three independent readers in a total of 23 patients), but found no significant correlation between tumor volume and percentage of acquired mutant reads in the plasma [78]. In a Danish group of patients with mCRC, both total cfDNA and mutated DNA were analyzed in relation to positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) parameters similar to a study published in lung cancer [79].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The purpose was to demonstrate the presence of pre-existing mutated clones as mechanism of resistance to panitumumab. In contrast, Morelli et al recently measured the sums of lesion volumes measured (manually on each image, by three independent readers in a total of 23 patients), but found no significant correlation between tumor volume and percentage of acquired mutant reads in the plasma [78]. In a Danish group of patients with mCRC, both total cfDNA and mutated DNA were analyzed in relation to positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) parameters similar to a study published in lung cancer [79].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this study, KRAS amplifications rather than mutations were detected at the time of progression and were suggested to be a previously under-investigated mechanism of EGFR resistance. In a recent report, newly detectable mutations were demonstrated with highly sensitive BEAMing analysis in plasma from a total of 32/62 patients, including 11 with multiple new mutations [78]. When 20 tumor samples from the 27 cases with new detected plasma KRAS mutations were re-analyzed, seven (36%) tested positive for low-frequency sub-clones, indicating that the developed mutations derive from rare pre-existing clones in the primary tumor tissue, and that the relative clonal burden may develop over time.…”
Section: Cell-free Dna and Importance Of Tumor Dynamics During Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Установлено, что мутации тирозинкиназного до-мена EGFR встречаются при РТК редко -в 0,5-1 % случаев [5,8]. В то же время вплоть до 10-20 % первоначально отвечающих на терапию цетукси-мабом больных РТК становятся вторично рези-стентны к ней в результате появления мутаций во внеклеточном домене EGFR [4,34,35]. Эти вновь приобретённые мутации препятствуют связыва-нию EGFR с цетуксимабом.…”
Section: статус гена Egfrunclassified
“…The first reported mutation of resistance was a change of a Serine to an Arginine at position 492 (S492R; ref. 3), which occurs in approximately 16% of patients treated with cetuximab, as assessed by ctDNA (9,10). More recently, other mutations in EGFR ECD have been identified in patients treated with anti-EGFR mAb (R451C, K467T, G465R) and in preclinical models of resistance to anti-EGFR therapy (S464L, I491M; refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%