2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-014-0428-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis of differences in copy numbers using read depth obtained from PCR-enriched samples and controls

Abstract: BackgroundNext-generation sequencing (NGS) is rapidly becoming common practice in clinical diagnostics and cancer research. In addition to the detection of single nucleotide variants (SNVs), information on copy number variants (CNVs) is of great interest. Several algorithms exist to detect CNVs by analyzing whole genome sequencing data or data from samples enriched by hybridization-capture. PCR-enriched amplicon-sequencing data have special characteristics that have been taken into account by only one publicly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9,21,22 In addition, tumor size of NF2 type was larger than that of TRAKLS types, probably because of high proliferative ability. In fact, NF2 type meningioma showed higher Ki-67 LI compared with TRAKLS type, and this result is compatible with previous studies 14 has expanded the application of targeted amplicon sequencing. Current, reliable, clinically practical methods to investigate copynumber alterations include I-FISH and quantitative PCR analysis; however, mutations cannot be simultaneously confirmed with these methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…9,21,22 In addition, tumor size of NF2 type was larger than that of TRAKLS types, probably because of high proliferative ability. In fact, NF2 type meningioma showed higher Ki-67 LI compared with TRAKLS type, and this result is compatible with previous studies 14 has expanded the application of targeted amplicon sequencing. Current, reliable, clinically practical methods to investigate copynumber alterations include I-FISH and quantitative PCR analysis; however, mutations cannot be simultaneously confirmed with these methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…We determined regions of copy-number alteration based on their relative copy-number using the “copynumber” R package (64). For tumor-normal pairs without SNP array data, we estimated copy-number profiles based on sequencing data using Control-FREEC (65), Quandico (66), and Sequenza (67). We used GISTIC v2.0.22 (68) to determine regions of significant focal copy-number alterations, using ASCAT/Sequenza’s inferred copy-number segments, and associated copy-number values were defined as log 2 of the segment’s relative copy-number.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiplex PCR-based enrichment focuses sequencing efforts on a very small fraction of the genome, and the observed read depth for each of the regions can differ due to varying number of PCR amplicons, sequence variation, or PCR enrichment efficiency. For CNV detection in our PCR-enriched amplicon sequencing data of the 20 genes, we used two algorithms, Quandico [ 49 ] and ONCOCNV [ 50 ], specifically developed for CNV analysis of amplicon sequencing data. The CNVs detected with these algorithms were then verified experimentally using the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%