2014
DOI: 10.4300/jgme-d-14-00492.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Now You See It, Now You Don't: What Thinking Aloud Tells Us About Clinical Reasoning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students believe that it is simpler to think when they are asked to verbalize their thoughts while searching for information to finish the major complaint. This method is known as the think-aloud technique and some of the benefits are outlined by Bowen and Ilgen [ 19 ] and Pinnock et al [ 20 ]. First, it explains and describes a complex and parallel information with clinical reasoning processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Students believe that it is simpler to think when they are asked to verbalize their thoughts while searching for information to finish the major complaint. This method is known as the think-aloud technique and some of the benefits are outlined by Bowen and Ilgen [ 19 ] and Pinnock et al [ 20 ]. First, it explains and describes a complex and parallel information with clinical reasoning processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID- 19) has presented medical education with unprecedented challenges. Early clinical attachment delivery, which is designed to prepare undergraduate students for the clinical environment and foster communication, history-taking, and examination skills [10], has faced difficulties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Bowen and Ilgen, diagnostic reasoning is not a discrete, enduring, or reliably measurable skill. Accurate measurement in fact requires an observer to interpret processes that are heavily context dependent, usually not explicitly articulated, and often occur below conscious awareness of the observed clinician (Bowen and Ilgen 2014). Nevertheless, authors have attempted to infer progress in clinical reasoning ability across years using a written progress test (Williams et al 2011 Case-based clinical reasoning education, or any other approach recommended for preclinical education, attempts to prepare students for clinical encounters.…”
Section: How Does the Cbcr Methods Address These Prerequisites?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cognitive process of clinical reasoning varied involves the following: hypothetico-deductive [38], elaborated hypothetico-deductive [39], heuristic reasoning [40], schema-induction reasoning [41,42], and pattern recognition [33,43]. The reasoning process can be determined by analyzing the content of transcription result from think aloud methods and contrasting and comparing with known clinical reasoning pattern [44][45][46].…”
Section: Process Paradigm Of Clinical Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%