2014
DOI: 10.1002/pon.3726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomised controlled trial of a couples‐based sexuality intervention for men with localised prostate cancer and their female partners

Abstract: Although peer and nurse couples-based interventions can increase use of medical treatments for ED, this may not translate into better sexual or relationship outcomes. More research is needed into the optimal timing of interventions to improve sexual outcomes for men with prostate cancer and to identify the subpopulations that will benefit from them.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
112
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
112
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…determine the effect of the intervention specifically on sexual and urological problems after radical prostatectomy and therefore included only sexually active men. In similar studies, sexually active men treated with either radiation or surgery were recruited from three months up to 5-7 years after treatment [8,16,17], invited from cancer registries or outpatient clinics, and through public service announcements; however, only one study had a recruitment rate of 47% [16]. Furthermore, these recruitment strategies may introduce selfselection bias and result in a sample of participants who are not representative of the population to be examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…determine the effect of the intervention specifically on sexual and urological problems after radical prostatectomy and therefore included only sexually active men. In similar studies, sexually active men treated with either radiation or surgery were recruited from three months up to 5-7 years after treatment [8,16,17], invited from cancer registries or outpatient clinics, and through public service announcements; however, only one study had a recruitment rate of 47% [16]. Furthermore, these recruitment strategies may introduce selfselection bias and result in a sample of participants who are not representative of the population to be examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, only two previous randomized clinical trials have used complex strategies to target sexuality in couples after an operation for prostate cancer [16,17], and none included PFMT. Previous studies of interventions for couples after cancer have found it difficult to both recruit and retain couples [8,18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although peer and nurse couples based interventions may increase use of sexual aids this may not translate into better sexual outcomes [20]. Timing within the treatment trajectory may be crucial for sexuality intervention studies after prostate cancer treatment [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A three arm randomised control trial with 189 heterosexual couples in which the man had been previously diagnosed with prostate cancer compared the efficacy of peer-delivered telephone support Vs nursedelivered telephone counselling Vs usual care in improving both men's sexual and psychosocial adjustment [20]. Although peer and nurse couples based interventions may increase use of sexual aids this may not translate into better sexual outcomes [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation