2014
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-014-0537-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transferability of health cost evaluation across locations in oncology: cluster and principal component analysis as an explorative tool

Abstract: BackgroundThe transferability of economic evaluation in health care is of increasing interest in today’s globalized environment. Here, we propose a methodology for assessing the variability of data elements in cost evaluations in oncology. This method was tested in the context of the European Network of Excellence “Connective Tissues Cancers Network”.MethodsUsing a database that was previously aimed at exploring sarcoma management practices in Rhône-Alpes (France) and Veneto (Italy), we developed a model to as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further research activities could be designed, adopting a whole-disease model based on EU-shared clinical pathways, and including costs by country for each procedure or treatment in the model in order to enable an estimation of the local average costs of melanoma patients by disease stage. In fact, it has been demonstrated that there is still some discrepancy between the costs of cancer patient management in different countries, despite a consensus on the related clinical practice guidelines (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further research activities could be designed, adopting a whole-disease model based on EU-shared clinical pathways, and including costs by country for each procedure or treatment in the model in order to enable an estimation of the local average costs of melanoma patients by disease stage. In fact, it has been demonstrated that there is still some discrepancy between the costs of cancer patient management in different countries, despite a consensus on the related clinical practice guidelines (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, such policy-level decisions are highly specific to location, country, and system, and meta-analytic approaches are often inappropriate. [40][41][42] Given these practical barriers and theoretical contraindications for a quantitative analysis, qualitative synthesis was employed to aggregate results of individual studies included in this systematic review.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many factors influencing transferability have been identified [ 16 , 17 , 22 ], when imputing missing costs in a data-scarce setting, adjustments may only be feasible based on a limited number of available parameters. Motivated by the rapid de facto HTA assessments applied for Eastern Europe and other resource-limited settings [ 18 , 30 , 31 ], we assumed that missing costs can be imputed after adjusting only for a single macroeconomic indicator, such as gross domestic product per capita (GDPpc), total health expenditure per capita (THEpc) or governmental health expenditure per capita (GHEpc).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%