2014
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku1063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rfam 12.0: updates to the RNA families database

Abstract: The Rfam database (available at http://rfam.xfam.org) is a collection of non-coding RNA families represented by manually curated sequence alignments, consensus secondary structures and annotation gathered from corresponding Wikipedia, taxonomy and ontology resources. In this article, we detail updates and improvements to the Rfam data and website for the Rfam 12.0 release. We describe the upgrade of our search pipeline to use Infernal 1.1 and demonstrate its improved homology detection ability by comparison wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
781
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 942 publications
(800 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
781
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Noncoding RNAs were predicted by the Infernal program using default parameters 54 . Through comparing the similarity of secondary structure between the B. juncea sequence and Rfam (v12.0) database 55 , the noncoding RNAs were classified into different families (Supplementary Table 21).…”
Section: Competing Financial Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noncoding RNAs were predicted by the Infernal program using default parameters 54 . Through comparing the similarity of secondary structure between the B. juncea sequence and Rfam (v12.0) database 55 , the noncoding RNAs were classified into different families (Supplementary Table 21).…”
Section: Competing Financial Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6mA was specifically tied to regulation of protein coding genes, as it was rarely found on predicted microRNAs 15 (Supplementary Fig. 6b) and almost never directly on tRNAs (Supplementary Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consensus sequences for 11 individuals were also called separately, which assembled 82.5-99.1% of the genome. Gene annotation was done using DOGMA (Wyman et al 2004) and MITOS (Bernt et al 2013), with additional verification of transfer RNA (tRNA) by tRNAscan-SE (Schattner et al 2005) and RFam (Nawrocki et al 2015). The leftover specimens are stored at Kewalo Marine Laboratory (sample ID: C6, C16, K2, M2, M7, M12, N1 and N3) and at HIMB (sample ID: PLob1, PLob2 and PLob3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%