2014
DOI: 10.1038/nature13834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The expanding fireball of Nova Delphini 2013

Abstract: A classical nova occurs when material accreting onto the surface of a white dwarf in a close binary system ignites in a thermonuclear runaway. Complex structures observed in the ejecta at late stages could result from interactions with the companion during the common-envelope phase. Alternatively, the explosion could be intrinsically bipolar, resulting from a localized ignition on the surface of the white dwarf or as a consequence of rotational distortion. Studying the structure of novae during the earliest ph… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
48
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One physical picture, consistent with both optical (e.g., Schaefer et al 2014) and radio imaging (e.g., Chomiuk et al 2014), and the evolution of optical spectral lines (e.g., Ribeiro et al 2013;Shore et al 2013), is that the thermonuclear runaway is first accompanied by a slow ejection of mass with a toroidal geometry, the shape of which may be influenced by the binary companion (e.g., Livio et al 1990;Lloyd et al 1997). This slow outflow is then followed by a second discrete ejection or continuous wind (e.g., Bath & Shaviv 1976) with a higher velocity and more spherical geometry.…”
Section: Shock Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One physical picture, consistent with both optical (e.g., Schaefer et al 2014) and radio imaging (e.g., Chomiuk et al 2014), and the evolution of optical spectral lines (e.g., Ribeiro et al 2013;Shore et al 2013), is that the thermonuclear runaway is first accompanied by a slow ejection of mass with a toroidal geometry, the shape of which may be influenced by the binary companion (e.g., Livio et al 1990;Lloyd et al 1997). This slow outflow is then followed by a second discrete ejection or continuous wind (e.g., Bath & Shaviv 1976) with a higher velocity and more spherical geometry.…”
Section: Shock Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It remains to be seen how the upper limit on the γ-ray flux from V5589 Sgr compares with the detections of the four later Fermi-detected novae, all of which were observed in pointed mode with fluxes as faint as 2-3×10 −7 photons cm −2 s −1 . When the distances of 1.4 ± 0.04 kpc for V959 Mon (Linford et al 2015), > 6.5 kpc for V1324 Sco , and 4.5 ± 0.6 kpc for V339 Del (Schaefer et al 2014) are taken into account, V5589 Sgr appears to have been less luminous in the γ-rays than at least V1324 Sco and V339 Del. Since V339 Del is thought to have a low inclination and therefore to be viewed pole on (Schaefer et al 2014), viewing angle could play a role in setting the γ-ray luminosity.…”
Section: Connection To γ-Ray Producing Novaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the distances of 1.4 ± 0.04 kpc for V959 Mon (Linford et al 2015), > 6.5 kpc for V1324 Sco , and 4.5 ± 0.6 kpc for V339 Del (Schaefer et al 2014) are taken into account, V5589 Sgr appears to have been less luminous in the γ-rays than at least V1324 Sco and V339 Del. Since V339 Del is thought to have a low inclination and therefore to be viewed pole on (Schaefer et al 2014), viewing angle could play a role in setting the γ-ray luminosity. Alternatively, whereas Metzger et al (2015) argued that most relativistic protons in V1324 Sco and V339 Del were trapped and collided with proton targets to produce γ-rays, the low X-ray absorbing column for V5589 Sgr suggests that the ejecta mass might have been too low and/or the expansion speeds too high for this to have been the case for V5589 Sgr.…”
Section: Connection To γ-Ray Producing Novaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These derived lower limits should be smaller than the actual n e values because τ (Br γ ) can be considerably >1. An additional caveat in this analysis is the intrinsic assumption of spherical geometry for the ejecta (Slavin, O'Brien & Dunlop 1995), since a bipolar morphology appears more appropriate for V339 Del (see also Schaefer et al 2014;Shore et al 2016).…”
Section: Case B Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Munari et al (2013a) determined the interstellar reddening to V339 Del to be E(B − V) = 0.18, which we adopt here. Schaefer et al (2014) obtained near-IR interferometry of V339 Del, measuring its angular size within a day of the eruption. They observed the expansion of the remnant and, in conjunction with an assumed ejection velocity of 613 ± 79 km s −1 , deduced a distance of 4.54 ± 0.59 kpc for the nova.…”
Section: 3 9 D E L P H I N Imentioning
confidence: 99%