2014
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a4117
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Intracranial Collaterals on CT Angiography in Anterior Circulation Acute Ischemic Stroke

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Intracranial collaterals influence the prognosis of patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke. We compared the methods of scoring collaterals on pre-tPA brain CT angiography for predicting functional outcomes in acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
99
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
99
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Good collaterals and smaller early infarct changes, respectively, are associated with better outcomes. [1][2][3][4][5] Despite widespread acceptance of their importance, seemingly basic relationships and objective methods of quantification of the collaterals and infarct size for optimal clinical use remain ambiguous.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good collaterals and smaller early infarct changes, respectively, are associated with better outcomes. [1][2][3][4][5] Despite widespread acceptance of their importance, seemingly basic relationships and objective methods of quantification of the collaterals and infarct size for optimal clinical use remain ambiguous.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The leptomeningeal collateral status on the prethrombolysis CTA was assessed by 3 predefined criteria-Maas, Tan, and ASPECTS collaterals, which have been previously described. [15][16][17][18][19] Functional outcome was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months. An mRS score of 0-1 represented a favorable functional outcome.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The currently proposed methods of assessing collaterals are largely qualitative or semiquantitative, and there are no clear indications of the superiority of any of the available techniques 57 . This lack of consensus may contribute to an overall under appreciation of the fundamental role of collateral circulation in outcomes following AIS.…”
Section: Imaging Studies Of Collateral Circulation In the Clinical Sementioning
confidence: 99%