2014
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiu183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Vaccine-Derived Polioviruses in Mexico Using Environmental Surveillance

Abstract: VDPVs may emerge and spread in settings with inadequate coverage with IPV/OPV vaccination. Environmental surveillance can facilitate early detection in these settings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have reported a rapid decline in PV isolation around the OPV-to-IPV transition period, with a disappearance of PV vaccine strains from wastewater within 2 to 3 months after the cessation of OPV administration (40)(41)(42)(43). In contrast, our study showed the disappearance of Sabin-like PVs from the environment before OPV immunization had ceased (Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Previous studies have reported a rapid decline in PV isolation around the OPV-to-IPV transition period, with a disappearance of PV vaccine strains from wastewater within 2 to 3 months after the cessation of OPV administration (40)(41)(42)(43). In contrast, our study showed the disappearance of Sabin-like PVs from the environment before OPV immunization had ceased (Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…The frequency of SL2 detection in both BMFS and twophase samples can provide an important baseline to compare SL2 prevalence and persistence after the switch from trivalent OPV to bivalent OPV. The frequency of SL2 detection was comparable to other settings (Esteves-Jaramillo et al 2014;Nakamura et al 2015;Wahjuhono et al 2014;Wang et al 2014). This may be due to the high rate of PV2 shedding (88%), compared to PV1 (42%) and PV3 (58%) shedding 1 week after OPV use (Laassri et al 2005) as demonstrated by frequent PV2 detection within 3 weeks after OPV use (n = 10) compared to prior to OPV use (n = 32) (SL1: 40% vs. 38%, SL2: 90% vs. 84%, and SL3: 60% vs. 59% in BMFS and two-phase samples, respectively).…”
Section: Virus Detectionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“… Madagascar 10 Rakoto-Andrianarivelo et al, 2008 [37] ; Razafindratsimandresy et al, 2013 [21] . Mexico 4 Esteves-Jaramillo et al, 2014 [38] . Nigeria 409 Burns et al, 2013 [22] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%