Abstract:Hyperprolactinemia is associated with reproductive acyclicity in zoo African elephants (Loxodonta africana) and may contribute to the non-self-sustainability of the captive population in North America. It is a common cause of infertility in women and other mammals and can be treated with the dopamine agonist cabergoline. The objectives of this study were to assess prolactin responses to cabergoline treatment in hyperprolactinemic, acyclic African elephants and to determine the subsequent impact on ovarian cycl… Show more
“…However, too much prolactin can have negative consequences for normal ovarian function [ 20 – 22 ]. Prolactin is under inhibitory control from hypothalamic dopamine, and a similar mechanism is suggested for elephants based on observations of expected changes in prolactin secretion after administration of dopamine agonists and antagonists [ 5 , 28 ]. Hyperprolactinemia is often related to the development of prolactinomas, the most common pituitary tumor, as a result of reduced dopamine concentrations or sensitivity, or vasculature isolation that prevents dopamine from reaching the lactotrophs [ 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative effects of chronic elevated prolactin secretion on reproductive function generally involve inhibition of hypothalamic GnRH release and subsequent suppression of pituitary LH and FSH secretion, resulting in anovulation [ 25 ]. Pituitary prolactin secretion is under inhibitory control by dopamine [ 25 – 27 ] and there is evidence the same negative feedback mechanism works in elephants, based on findings that a dopamine agonist (cabergoline) decreases and an antagonist (domperidone) increases prolactin secretion [ 5 , 28 ]. In addition to hypothalamic inhibition by dopamine, other factors can stimulate prolactin synthesis or have a suppressive effect on dopaminergic tone: vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, estradiol, serotonin, oxytocin, thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TSH) and vasopressin [ 29 ].…”
As part of a multi-institutional study of zoo elephant welfare, we evaluated female elephants managed by zoos accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums and applied epidemiological methods to determine what factors in the zoo environment are associated with reproductive problems, including ovarian acyclicity and hyperprolactinemia. Bi-weekly blood samples were collected from 95 African (Loxodonta africana) and 75 Asian (Elephas maximus) (8–55 years of age) elephants over a 12-month period for analysis of serum progestogens and prolactin. Females were categorized as normal cycling (regular 13- to 17-week cycles), irregular cycling (cycles longer or shorter than normal) or acyclic (baseline progestogens, <0.1 ng/ml throughout), and having Low/Normal (<14 or 18 ng/ml) or High (≥14 or 18 ng/ml) prolactin for Asian and African elephants, respectively. Rates of normal cycling, acyclicity and irregular cycling were 73.2, 22.5 and 4.2% for Asian, and 48.4, 37.9 and 13.7% for African elephants, respectively, all of which differed between species (P < 0.05). For African elephants, univariate assessment found that social isolation decreased and higher enrichment diversity increased the chance a female would cycle normally. The strongest multi-variable models included Age (positive) and Enrichment Diversity (negative) as important factors of acyclicity among African elephants. The Asian elephant data set was not robust enough to support multi-variable analyses of cyclicity status. Additionally, only 3% of Asian elephants were found to be hyperprolactinemic as compared to 28% of Africans, so predictive analyses of prolactin status were conducted on African elephants only. The strongest multi-variable model included Age (positive), Enrichment Diversity (negative), Alternate Feeding Methods (negative) and Social Group Contact (positive) as predictors of hyperprolactinemia. In summary, the incidence of ovarian cycle problems and hyperprolactinemia predominantly affects African elephants, and increases in social stability and feeding and enrichment diversity may have positive influences on hormone status.
“…However, too much prolactin can have negative consequences for normal ovarian function [ 20 – 22 ]. Prolactin is under inhibitory control from hypothalamic dopamine, and a similar mechanism is suggested for elephants based on observations of expected changes in prolactin secretion after administration of dopamine agonists and antagonists [ 5 , 28 ]. Hyperprolactinemia is often related to the development of prolactinomas, the most common pituitary tumor, as a result of reduced dopamine concentrations or sensitivity, or vasculature isolation that prevents dopamine from reaching the lactotrophs [ 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative effects of chronic elevated prolactin secretion on reproductive function generally involve inhibition of hypothalamic GnRH release and subsequent suppression of pituitary LH and FSH secretion, resulting in anovulation [ 25 ]. Pituitary prolactin secretion is under inhibitory control by dopamine [ 25 – 27 ] and there is evidence the same negative feedback mechanism works in elephants, based on findings that a dopamine agonist (cabergoline) decreases and an antagonist (domperidone) increases prolactin secretion [ 5 , 28 ]. In addition to hypothalamic inhibition by dopamine, other factors can stimulate prolactin synthesis or have a suppressive effect on dopaminergic tone: vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, estradiol, serotonin, oxytocin, thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TSH) and vasopressin [ 29 ].…”
As part of a multi-institutional study of zoo elephant welfare, we evaluated female elephants managed by zoos accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums and applied epidemiological methods to determine what factors in the zoo environment are associated with reproductive problems, including ovarian acyclicity and hyperprolactinemia. Bi-weekly blood samples were collected from 95 African (Loxodonta africana) and 75 Asian (Elephas maximus) (8–55 years of age) elephants over a 12-month period for analysis of serum progestogens and prolactin. Females were categorized as normal cycling (regular 13- to 17-week cycles), irregular cycling (cycles longer or shorter than normal) or acyclic (baseline progestogens, <0.1 ng/ml throughout), and having Low/Normal (<14 or 18 ng/ml) or High (≥14 or 18 ng/ml) prolactin for Asian and African elephants, respectively. Rates of normal cycling, acyclicity and irregular cycling were 73.2, 22.5 and 4.2% for Asian, and 48.4, 37.9 and 13.7% for African elephants, respectively, all of which differed between species (P < 0.05). For African elephants, univariate assessment found that social isolation decreased and higher enrichment diversity increased the chance a female would cycle normally. The strongest multi-variable models included Age (positive) and Enrichment Diversity (negative) as important factors of acyclicity among African elephants. The Asian elephant data set was not robust enough to support multi-variable analyses of cyclicity status. Additionally, only 3% of Asian elephants were found to be hyperprolactinemic as compared to 28% of Africans, so predictive analyses of prolactin status were conducted on African elephants only. The strongest multi-variable model included Age (positive), Enrichment Diversity (negative), Alternate Feeding Methods (negative) and Social Group Contact (positive) as predictors of hyperprolactinemia. In summary, the incidence of ovarian cycle problems and hyperprolactinemia predominantly affects African elephants, and increases in social stability and feeding and enrichment diversity may have positive influences on hormone status.
“…For this reason, research goals may at times appear diametrically opposed. For example, studies have focused on ways to improve the reproductive performance of captive elephants (Morfeld, Ball & Brown, ), while immunocontraception is being developed as a management tool for controlling free‐ranging populations in resource‐limited habitats (Bechert & Fraker, ).…”
African elephants Loxodonta africana and Asian elephants Elephas maximus are not thriving in many captive settings and are threatened throughout their native ranges. Many zoos support in situ conservation projects and provide opportunities to conduct ex situ research in controlled settings with comparably approachable animals. Zoo elephant projects may facilitate fieldwork with free‐ranging elephants (e.g. development of non‐invasive sampling and analytical tools), which may then also improve the husbandry of elephants in human care. Free‐ranging elephants also benefit from drug therapies and veterinary care when they are orphaned, kept as working elephants or brought in as rehabilitation cases – especially as human–elephant conflicts become more common as a result of ever‐expanding human populations. Much has been learned about the basic biology and husbandry needs of elephants but, often, the more we learn, the more questions arise. There are physiological differences between African and Asian elephants, and this should affect the management of these animals. This paper will provide brief overviews of the current state of knowledge regarding the pharmacology, nutrition, reproduction, sensory biology and diseases (primarily elephant endotheliotropic herpesvirus infections) relevant to elephants with recommendations for future research.
“…In other species, prolactin is controlled primarily through a dopamine negative feedback mechanism, and in women can be treated with drugs that increase dopamine production (Moult, Rees, & Besser, ). A clinical trial with one such agonist, cabergoline, in hyperprolactinemic African elephants (1–2 mg twice weekly for 4–12 months; n = 8) ended with mixed results (Ball & Brown, ; Morfeld et al, ). Prolactin was decreased significantly in all but one of the females, but only during treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, blood samples were collected once or twice a week without anesthesia from either an ear or leg vein, as part of routine hormone monitoring performed at the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute (SCBI), and in conjunction with other studies (e.g., Brown & Lehnhardt, ; Brown et al, , 2016; Dow & Brown, ; Morfeld, Ball, & Brown, ; Prado‐Oviedo et al, ), including the Using Science to Understand Zoo Elephant Welfare study (Carlstead, Mench, Meehan, & Brown, ). Serum samples collected for the 2012 elephant welfare study were used to establish current cyclicity and prolactin status for all elephants included in this study ( n = 78 at 37 institutions).…”
Hyperprolactinemia is a common disorder of the hypothalamic‐pituitary axis, and a cause of ovarian dysfunction in women. Currently, over half of non‐cycling African elephant females in North America also are hyperprolactinemic, suggesting a similar link between these two conditions may exist. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between acyclicity and prolactin status by comparing mean prolactin concentrations of bi‐weekly samples collected over a 1‐year period in 2012 with 20 years of historical weekly progestagen data to assess cyclicity. Females were categorized as: 1) non‐cycling with an average prolactin concentration of 15 ng/ml or greater (HIGH; n = 17); 2) non‐cycling with an average prolactin concentration below 15 ng/ml (LOW; n = 16); and 3) typical temporal patterns of progestagen and prolactin secretion (NORMAL; n = 45), and evaluated based on length of time (in years) they had experienced ovarian inactivity. Results showed that the majority of HIGH prolactin elephants had been acyclic for at least 5 years, and in a number of cases (n = 9) for over 10 years. By contrast, most of the LOW prolactin elephants had experienced acyclicity for less than 5 years. Finally, there was a positive association between duration of acyclicity and mean prolactin concentrations, with an increase in the likelihood of having higher prolactin concentrations the longer an individual was acyclic. This study highlights the importance of longitudinal hormonal datasets to examine temporal changes in biological functioning and better understand the etiology of infertility problems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.