1956
DOI: 10.1039/jr9560001219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

253. Cellular constituents. The chemistry of xanthine oxidase. Part III. Estimations of the co-factors and the catalytic activities of enzyme fractions from cow's milk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DCPIP is frequently used as electron acceptor in enzyme-catalyzed oxidation reactions. For bovine xanthine oxidase, the rate of electron transfer from conventional substrates to DCPIP approximates that for electron transfer to the physiologic acceptor, molecular oxygen (Avis et al, 1956). However, the electron acceptors receive their electrons at fundamentally different cofactors: the electron transfer to oxygen takes place at the FAD site (Komai et al, 1969), whereas DCPIP or other artificial acceptors (e.g., phenazine methosulfate or ferricyanide) directly receive the electrons from the reduced molybdenum atom .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DCPIP is frequently used as electron acceptor in enzyme-catalyzed oxidation reactions. For bovine xanthine oxidase, the rate of electron transfer from conventional substrates to DCPIP approximates that for electron transfer to the physiologic acceptor, molecular oxygen (Avis et al, 1956). However, the electron acceptors receive their electrons at fundamentally different cofactors: the electron transfer to oxygen takes place at the FAD site (Komai et al, 1969), whereas DCPIP or other artificial acceptors (e.g., phenazine methosulfate or ferricyanide) directly receive the electrons from the reduced molybdenum atom .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XO Activity-XO activity was monitored spectrophotometrically at 295 nm immediately before each set of experiments through its ability to oxidize xanthine to uric acid (⑀ ϭ 9,600 M Ϫ1 s Ϫ1 ) (30). In some experiments, XO activity was also monitored by superoxide radical anion production that was followed by cytochrome c Fe(III) (50 M) reduction at 550 nm (⌬⑀ ϭ 21,000 M Ϫ1 cm Ϫ1 ) (31).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different concentrations of tested compounds were added to the samples before the enzyme was added and their effects on the generation of uric acid was used to calculate regression lines and IC 50 values. 18 Allopurinol was used as a positive standard.…”
Section: Xanthine Oxidase Activity Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%