The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3344-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meniscal allograft transplantation. Part 2: systematic review of transplant timing, outcomes, return to competition, associated procedures, and prevention of osteoarthritis

Abstract: Systematic review of level II-IV studies, Level IV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
61
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
61
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For meniscus injury, the meniscus should be preserved as much as possible in order to delay progression of degeneration of articular cartilage . After meniscectomy or meniscal degeneration, transplantations of the meniscal graft or artificial meniscus have been attempted; however, the outcome of the transplantations is still controversial . A new treatment to regenerate the meniscus is needed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For meniscus injury, the meniscus should be preserved as much as possible in order to delay progression of degeneration of articular cartilage . After meniscectomy or meniscal degeneration, transplantations of the meniscal graft or artificial meniscus have been attempted; however, the outcome of the transplantations is still controversial . A new treatment to regenerate the meniscus is needed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 For MAT on the knee, current studies consistently reveal favorable clinical and functional results in young and active meniscectomized patients. 22 These improvements in symptoms, function, and quality of life were also shown at longer follow-up periods of 7–14 years. 22 Furthermore, according to Samitier et al, 22 although MAT does not necessarily prevent degeneration in previously healthy cartilage, it may prevent the progression of cartilage damaged at long-term follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…22 These improvements in symptoms, function, and quality of life were also shown at longer follow-up periods of 7–14 years. 22 Furthermore, according to Samitier et al, 22 although MAT does not necessarily prevent degeneration in previously healthy cartilage, it may prevent the progression of cartilage damaged at long-term follow-up. Because of the successful use of MAT on the knee, this study aimed to demonstrate MAT as a valuable alternative to treating osteochondral defects of the radiocarpal, MCP, and PIP joints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, despite being performed for over three decades, controversy persists regarding several of the finer aspects of MAT, including the following: Indications for surgery and patient selection, including age, symptoms and timing of surgery; graft preservation technique; fixation technique (bony fixation vs. an all-suture technique); postsurgical rehabilitation procedures; appropriate outcome measures, including Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form, Tegner activity level score, Fulkerson questionnaire, WOMAC index, and the Kellgren and Lawrence OA grade; the impact of concomitant surgical procedures; impact on OA; and what is considered a successful surgery. These controversies continue to be salient in this field considering the growing number of MAT procedures performed annually together with the lack of controlled clinical studies and long-term follow-up data (2,4,6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although still relatively rare compared with other types of orthopedic surgery, meniscal allograft transplant (MAT) is a powerful tool for orthopedic surgeons that is gaining popularity due to the known complications of meniscectomy (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%