2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-014-2594-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phase I, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of oral panobinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors and various degrees of hepatic function

Abstract: Despite increased plasma exposure, patients with mild or moderate hepatic dysfunction could be safely treated with the same starting dose of panobinostat as patients with normal hepatic function, with careful monitoring and dose adjustments as required.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We utilized cell viability as well as colony forming assays to demonstrate that PS and SAHA synergized with CNDAC in killing AML cells. Pharmacokinetic evaluations show that the maximum serum plasma concentrations of vorinostat are ~1.4 µM, 1–3 h post dosing in AML (45, 46) and ~19 nM for PS (46) indicating that the concentrations of vorinostat and PS achieved in patients are more than sufficient to inhibit both the proliferative capacity as well as kill AML cells. Correlative studies during therapy would help validate the action of this combination on the proliferative index and survival of circulating AML blasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We utilized cell viability as well as colony forming assays to demonstrate that PS and SAHA synergized with CNDAC in killing AML cells. Pharmacokinetic evaluations show that the maximum serum plasma concentrations of vorinostat are ~1.4 µM, 1–3 h post dosing in AML (45, 46) and ~19 nM for PS (46) indicating that the concentrations of vorinostat and PS achieved in patients are more than sufficient to inhibit both the proliferative capacity as well as kill AML cells. Correlative studies during therapy would help validate the action of this combination on the proliferative index and survival of circulating AML blasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mild and moderate hepatic impairment increased the AUC of panobinostat by 43% and 105%, respectively, while the C max increased by 40 and 80% . The terminal half‐life was not modified.…”
Section: Histone Deacetylase Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In patients with advanced cancer, those with mild and moderate hepatic impairment had areas under the panobinostat concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC ? ) that were 43 and 105 % higher than those with normal hepatic function [6,21], and dosage modification is recommended in these patients [6]. The effect of severe hepatic impairment on panobinostat pharmacokinetics has not been determined; therefore, panobinostat should not be administered in these patients.…”
Section: Pharmacokineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hepatic impairment is associated with increased panobinostat exposure [6,21]. In patients with advanced cancer, those with mild and moderate hepatic impairment had areas under the panobinostat concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC ? )…”
Section: Pharmacokineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%