2014
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

METAINTER: meta-analysis of multiple regression models in genome-wide association studies

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NMA is perhaps the most popular method for capturing flexibility in docking (Mashiach et al, 2010; May and Zacharias, 2005; Moal and Bates, 2010; Oliwa and Shen, 2015; Shen, 2013; Venkatraman and Ritchie, 2012). Although the metrics of docking evaluations and the dataset vary between studies, the flexible component RMSDs between the native complex conformation and the best predictions typically improve less than 0.5 Å, and sometimes the conformation of the docked monomer is even further from the bound than the unbound (Mashiach et al, 2010; May and Zacharias, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NMA is perhaps the most popular method for capturing flexibility in docking (Mashiach et al, 2010; May and Zacharias, 2005; Moal and Bates, 2010; Oliwa and Shen, 2015; Shen, 2013; Venkatraman and Ritchie, 2012). Although the metrics of docking evaluations and the dataset vary between studies, the flexible component RMSDs between the native complex conformation and the best predictions typically improve less than 0.5 Å, and sometimes the conformation of the docked monomer is even further from the bound than the unbound (Mashiach et al, 2010; May and Zacharias, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, two kinds of approaches for utilising univariate summary statistics in multivariate testing have been proposed: 1) one SNP against multiple traits (Stephens, 2013;Vuckovic et al, 2015;Zhu et al, 2015) and 2) multiple SNPs against one trait (Vaitsiakhovich et al, 2015;Feng et al, 2014;Yang et al, 2012). We propose a new framework, metaCCA, that unifies both of the existing approaches by allowing canonical correlation analysis (CCA) of multiple SNPs against multiple traits based on univariate summary statistics and publicly available databases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To conduct meta-analysis METAINTER software was employed assuming a fixed effects model. Gamma approximated negative sum of log transformed interaction statistics from each of the two sets were considered as the test statistic for each variant pair and was tested with a weighted Chi-square statistic with four degrees of freedom 44 . Odds ratio and associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated with unconditional logistic regression with independence assumption among each component of SNP pairs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%