Replacing Ambulatory Surgical Follow-Up Visits With Mobile App Home Monitoring: Modeling Cost-Effective Scenarios

Abstract

BackgroundWomen’s College Hospital (WCH) offers specialized surgical procedures, including ambulatory breast reconstruction in post-mastectomy breast cancer patients. Most patients receiving ambulatory surgery have low rates of postoperative events necessitating clinic visits. Increasingly, mobile monitoring and follow-up care is used to overcome the distance patients must travel to receive specialized care at a reduced cost to society. WCH has completed a feasibility study using a mobile app (QoC Health Inc, Toronto) that suggests high patient satisfaction and adequate detection of postoperative complications.ObjectiveThe proposed cost-effectiveness study models the replacement of conventional, in-person postoperative follow-up care with mobile app follow-up care following ambulatory breast reconstruction in post-mastectomy breast cancer patients.MethodsThis is a societal perspective cost-effectiveness analysis, wherein all costs are assessed irrespective of the payer. The patient/caregiver, health care system, and externally borne costs are calculated within the first postoperative month based on cost information provided by WCH and QoC Health Inc. The effectiveness of telemedicine and conventional follow-up care is measured as successful surgical outcomes at 30-days postoperative, and is modeled based on previous clinical trials containing similar patient populations and surgical risks.ResultsThis costing assumes that 1000 patients are enrolled in bring-your-own-device (BYOD) mobile app follow-up per year and that 1.64 in-person follow-ups are attended in the conventional arm within the first month postoperatively. The total cost difference between mobile app and in-person follow-up care is $245 CAD ($223 USD based on the current exchange rate), with in-person follow-up being more expensive ($381 CAD) than mobile app follow-up care ($136 CAD). This takes into account the total of health care system, patient, and external borne costs. If we examine health care system costs alone, in-person follow-up is $38 CAD ($35 USD) more expensive than mobile app follow-up care over the first postoperative month. The baseline difference in effect is modeled to be zero based on clinical trials examining the effectiveness of telephone follow-up care in similar patient populations. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) is not reportable in this scenario. An incremental net benefit (INB) is reportable, and reflects merely the cost difference between the two interventions for any willingness-to-pay value (INB=$245 CAD). The cost-effectiveness of mobile app follow-up even holds in scenarios where all mobile patients attend one in-person follow-up.ConclusionsMobile app follow-up care is suitably targeted to low-risk postoperative ambulatory patients. It can be cost-effective from a societal and health care system perspective.

The Effectiveness and Safety of Utilizing Mobile Phone–Based Programs for Rehabilitation After Lumbar Spinal Surgery: Multicenter, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

“…Former studies also claimed communication with doctors was vital for patients' compliance. And digital technology should be applied to supplement interaction with patients [28,29]. Besides the interaction with doctors, a survey of patients with medium and low compliance showed that the worry about the accuracy of their action was another important reason for giving up the system.…”

The Impact of Mobile Application Support on the Quality of Care of Kidney Patients

“…The patients of chronic pain were able to easily communicate their pain level to the medical doctors and physicians. Armstrong et al (2014) has evaluated the role of mobile application support in improving quality care. The study focused on examining the contribution of mobile homebased apps in reducing the follow up visits of patients.…”

3MD for Chronic Conditions, a Model for Motivational mHealth Design: Embedded Case Study (Preprint)

“…Thanks to advancements in treatments, BC survivorship is on a steady rise and this cancer is no longer thought of as an acute illness but rather a chronic condition [3,4]. It is common to find mHealth solutions for BC in the scientific literature such as tracking sleep patterns [35], symptoms and treatment side effect management [35][36][37], breast health and wellbeing assessments [38,39], and even comprehensive lifestyle programs with nutrition and physical activity elements [40].…”