2014
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous retrieval of an endothelialized AMPLATZER cardiac plug from the abdominal aorta 6 months after embolization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of the current study demonstrated clinically insignificant leaks in 7% of patients at TEE follow‐up, with no related thromboembolic event. Thus, attempts to reposition the device and achieve complete sealing, which bear the risk of pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade by injuring the LAA , can be minimized and a less than ideal position seems to be acceptable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of the current study demonstrated clinically insignificant leaks in 7% of patients at TEE follow‐up, with no related thromboembolic event. Thus, attempts to reposition the device and achieve complete sealing, which bear the risk of pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade by injuring the LAA , can be minimized and a less than ideal position seems to be acceptable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study published by Swaans et al [5] described device embolization 3 months following the procedure. Another case described percutaneous retrieval of an AMPLATZER cardiac plug 6 months after embolization [23]. In a systematic review, Aminian et al [24] concluded that embolization occurred mostly in the periprocedural period but late embolization was not uncommon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 Endothelialization of the migrated device can make the retrieval very difficult and potentially traumatic. 16…”
Section: Potential Challenges Of Using the Avpmentioning
confidence: 99%