2014
DOI: 10.1177/0269216314550374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patients’ perception of implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation at the end of life

Abstract: Patients regard the implantable cardioverter defibrillator as a complex and solely beneficial device, with little insight regarding its potential impact on a peaceful death. This review confirms the need for professionals to discuss with patients and families implantable cardioverter defibrillator functionality and deactivation at appropriate opportunities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent work suggests that patients themselves face uncertainty with the ethical and legal implications of CIED deactivation and ultimately feel more comfortable leaving the decision in a physician's hands, thereby stressing the importance of communication between providers and patients. 31 Although the present study is one of the first to characterize the patient-specific factors and outcomes for patients who undergo CIED deactivation with or without a PCMC, we recognize its limitations. Our results are constrained to a homogeneous population that is largely white, Christian, and from Minnesota, which limits generalizability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent work suggests that patients themselves face uncertainty with the ethical and legal implications of CIED deactivation and ultimately feel more comfortable leaving the decision in a physician's hands, thereby stressing the importance of communication between providers and patients. 31 Although the present study is one of the first to characterize the patient-specific factors and outcomes for patients who undergo CIED deactivation with or without a PCMC, we recognize its limitations. Our results are constrained to a homogeneous population that is largely white, Christian, and from Minnesota, which limits generalizability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…2,18 Preparing for future events through use of patient education or advance directives may be helpful and should be a priority for clinicians because patients with CIEDs are often underprepared for EOL, and they face challenges with how their devices should be managed. 5,30,31 Most patients do not mention CIEDs in their advance directive documents, and communication between patients and clinicians is often lacking until the last moments of life. 5,[31][32][33] In this study, we retrospectively explored the survival and associated factors of patients who underwent CIED deactivation and who received or did not receive a concurrent PCMC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patients have expressed that some of the information they receive from the health care professionals is not adequate. They want to be better informed about their prognosis and want to feel that the professionals listen to them (45). Honest and competent delivery of information maximizes the patients' comprehension of their prognosis (46).…”
Section: Palliative Care Communication In Heart Failure Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that many patients have several ICD shocks during the last days of their life, and that discussions about deactivation rarely take place (43,44). Patients might regard the ICD as a solely beneficial device, having little insight about its possible impact on a peaceful death (45).…”
Section: End-of-life Carementioning
confidence: 99%