2014
DOI: 10.1890/13-1507.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allocation trade‐offs dominate the response of tropical forest growth to seasonal and interannual drought

Abstract: What determines the seasonal and interannual variation of growth rates in trees in a tropical forest? We explore this question with a novel four-year high-temporal-resolution data set of carbon allocation from two forest plots in the Bolivian Amazon. The forests show strong seasonal variation in tree wood growth rates, which are largely explained by shifts in carbon allocation, and not by shifts in total productivity. At the deeper soil plot, there was a clear seasonal trade-off between wood and canopy NPP, wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
108
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
9
108
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Adding to this, recent studies suggest that C allocation strategies in tropical forests trigger a temporal decoupling between NPP components [Doughty et al, 2014]. During their 4 year high temporal resolution study in two forest plots in the Bolivian Amazon, a strong 2010 drought strongly reduced photosynthesis, whereas NPP remained constant and even increased in the 6 month period following the drought.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Lowland Anpp Components To Climate Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Adding to this, recent studies suggest that C allocation strategies in tropical forests trigger a temporal decoupling between NPP components [Doughty et al, 2014]. During their 4 year high temporal resolution study in two forest plots in the Bolivian Amazon, a strong 2010 drought strongly reduced photosynthesis, whereas NPP remained constant and even increased in the 6 month period following the drought.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Lowland Anpp Components To Climate Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the deep-soil plot was inhabited by species typical of humid regions, the shallow-soil plot comprised species more typical of a dry deciduous forest with more seasonal leaf and wood production. As a result, the shallow-soil plot showed a more regular seasonal but also substantial interannual variation in NPP, suggesting a greater interannual drought sensitivity of dry deciduous tree species [Doughty et al, 2014]. Therefore, local topoedaphic characteristics associated with water availability have the potential to determine the composition of tree species, which in turn could have important consequences for the tolerance of tropical lowland forests to climate anomalies.…”
Section: Effects Of Local Site Characteristics (Topography and Disturmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 that CLM is dramatically overestimating LAI across the mesic regions of the terrestrial biosphere. This issue, often masked when only mean annual values or zonal means are considered, deserves more attention, and it is likely that recent detailed studies of carbon allocation (e.g., Doughty et al, 2014) could improve this part of the model.…”
Section: Impacts Of Modifications To the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, seasonal reductions in wood NPP were found associated with carbon preferentially allocated to either root or canopy NPP during the dry season (Doughty et al, 2015b). Due to significant differences in turnover times of plant tissues (i.e., leaves, wood, fine roots) this suggests that projected increases in temperature and dry season length could strongly affect tropical C storage by shifting C allocation away from wood NPP (Hofhansl et al, 2015) and toward canopy and root NPP to alleviate droughtinduced resource limitation (Doughty et al, 2014). As a result, tropical C storage will differ considerably depending on if C is stored in long-lived wood or allocated to plant tissue with reduced lifespan (Körner et al, 2005).…”
Section: Shifts In Plant C Allocation Will Increase C Turnover and Thmentioning
confidence: 99%