2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-014-2239-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference of confounding factors on the use of (1,3)-beta-D-glucan in the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis in the intensive care unit

Abstract: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are an increasing problem in intensive care units (ICUs), and conventional diagnostic methods are not always reliable or timely enough to deliver appropriate antimicrobial therapy. The dosage of fungal antigens in serum is a promising diagnostic technique, but several confounding factors, such as treatment with immunoglobulins (Ig), albumin, or antifungals, could interfere with the correct interpretation of the (1,3)-beta-D-glucan (BG) assay. This study assessed the reliabilit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This will hopefully be associated with the following most appreciated side effects: (1) primary cost savings (e.g., due to the waiving of expensive antifungal drugs and reduced hospital and ICU stay) and (2) reducing drug resistance rates (with secondary cost savings). Although the combined use of BDG and PCT was recently described to be suitable for early differential diagnosis between candidemia and bacteremia in intensive care units [22], the diagnostic value of BDG for IFI diagnosis is not free of doubts and subject of controversial discussions [37][38][39][40]. In line with that, BDG recently failed to be a suitable biomarker for reliable IFI diagnosis in septic shock within the presented cohort [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This will hopefully be associated with the following most appreciated side effects: (1) primary cost savings (e.g., due to the waiving of expensive antifungal drugs and reduced hospital and ICU stay) and (2) reducing drug resistance rates (with secondary cost savings). Although the combined use of BDG and PCT was recently described to be suitable for early differential diagnosis between candidemia and bacteremia in intensive care units [22], the diagnostic value of BDG for IFI diagnosis is not free of doubts and subject of controversial discussions [37][38][39][40]. In line with that, BDG recently failed to be a suitable biomarker for reliable IFI diagnosis in septic shock within the presented cohort [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Elevated BDG serum concentrations of more than 80 pg/ml have a high diagnostic accuracy to predict ICI [12, 13, 18, 33, 34]. However, the available data suggest that many ICU interventions may interfere by increasing BDG serum concentrations [11, 14, 15]. In addition, the diagnostic accuracy of BDG has been reported only for candidemia rather than ICI in general and may also depend on the fungal species [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, falsely increased BDG serum concentrations in the absence of ICI may be induced by several common ICU interventions. For example, concurrent bacteremia, hemodialysis membranes, administrations of blood products, and treatment with albumin or immunoglobulin products can interfere with BDG measurements [11, 14, 15]. If relevant, this type of interference would significantly reduce the clinical usability of BDG assays in critically ill patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In IVIg products containing maltose, erroneously elevated blood sugar values can occur when using GDH-PQQ test strips [87]. Diagnostic assays using Beta-D-Glucan for fungal testing can be false positive [88]. Immunoglobulin treatment can transfer antibodies to blood groups, affecting serological test.…”
Section: Miscellaneousmentioning
confidence: 99%