Barriers to care for children with orofacial clefts in North Carolina

Abstract

Background Little is known about the barriers faced by families of children with birth defects in obtaining healthcare. We examined reported perceived barriers to care and satisfaction with care among mothers of children with orofacial clefts. Methods In 2006, a validated barriers to care mail/phone survey was administered in North Carolina to all resident mothers of children with orofacial clefts born between 2001 and 2004. Potential participants were identified using the North Carolina Birth Defects Monitoring Program, an active, state-wide, population-based birth defects registry. Five barriers to care subscales were examined: pragmatics, skills, marginalization, expectations, and knowledge/beliefs. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Results were stratified by cleft type and presence of other birth defects. Results Of 475 eligible participants, 51.6% (n = 245) responded. The six most commonly reported perceived barriers to care were all part of the pragmatics subscale: having to take time off work (45.3%); long waits in the waiting rooms (37.6%); taking care of household responsibilities (29.7%); meeting other family members' needs (29.5%); waiting too many days for appointments (27.0%); and cost (25.0%). Most respondents (72.3%, 175/242) felt “very satisfied” with their child's cleft care. Conclusion Although most participants reported being satisfied with their child's care, many perceived barriers to care were identified. Due to the limited understanding and paucity of research on barriers to care for children with birth defects, including orofacial clefts, additional research on barriers to care and factors associated with them are needed.

Factors associated with the timeliness of postnatal surgical repair of spina bifida

“…The selection of covariates was informed by previous research on timeliness of care or access to care among children with special health care needs (CSHCN), including children with birth defects [5, 7, 25, 34, 37]. Maternal characteristics were age at delivery, race/ethnicity, nativity, education, marital status, and rural residency.…”

Editorial utility of population‐based birth defects surveillance for monitoring the health of infants and as a foundation for etiologic research

“…They found that almost half of the respondents traveled more than an hour to receive care. Further work identified additional barriers, including having to take time off from work, long waits for appointments, and cost (Cassell et al, ). Work is in progress using data from the Florida Birth Defects Registry to similarly assess distance to care as a potential barrier.…”

Acción de tutela y barreras de acceso a servicios de salud en labio y/o paladar hendido

“…A pesar de las barreras descritas, la mayoría de las madres responden sentirse "muy satisfechas" con el cuidado del niño (72,3%). Los autores sugieren realizar investigaciones adicionales sobre las barreras para el cuidado de los niños con hendiduras orofaciales y los factores asociados (15). Por otra parte, Grollemund y cola-| Acción de tutela y barreras de acceso a servicios de salud en labio y/o paladar hendido Luis Fernando Restrepo P., Wendy Yorlady Córdoba G., María Clara González C., Jaime Alberto Ruiz C., Ingrid Mora D., Caroll Susana Parada G., Laura Esperanza Cita P.…”