2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overuse of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Community Practice Urology

Abstract: Purpose We examined index urological surgeries to assess utilization patterns of antimicrobial prophylaxis in a large, community based population. Materials and Methods From the Premier Perspectives Database we identified patients who underwent inpatient urological surgeries that are considered index procedures by the ABU (American Board of Urology), including radical prostatectomy, partial or radical nephrectomy, radical cystectomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, transurethral resection of the prosta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Reasons for deviation from antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines in RC patients include increased patient comorbidities, preoperative bacteriuria, difficult operations associated with fecal contamination, and indwelling hardware such as ureteral stents, catheters and/or surgical drains. 21 Limiting antibiotic use in the postoperative setting seems logical but is difficult to apply universally as the incidence of postoperative infectious complications after RC patients remains high, and is reported in 16% to 38% of patients. 22,23 Limiting the use of preoperative antimicrobials in RC patients should be a priority.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Reasons for deviation from antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines in RC patients include increased patient comorbidities, preoperative bacteriuria, difficult operations associated with fecal contamination, and indwelling hardware such as ureteral stents, catheters and/or surgical drains. 21 Limiting antibiotic use in the postoperative setting seems logical but is difficult to apply universally as the incidence of postoperative infectious complications after RC patients remains high, and is reported in 16% to 38% of patients. 22,23 Limiting the use of preoperative antimicrobials in RC patients should be a priority.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of these patients underwent the 3 procedures reviewed in the current study. Mossanen et al 10 reviewed data from the same 2007 to 2012 database used by Calvert et al 9 and found that the mean duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis exceeded 24 hours for multiple urologic procedures but not for TURP, TURBT, or URS. Unlike the current study, Mossanen et al 10 excluded a substantial proportion of patients because the prescribed antimicrobial class was changed within 24 hours of the procedure and thus may have underestimated the rate of guideline-discordant postprocedural antimicrobial use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the largest studies on this topic, both of which relied exclusively on the same administrative database, made several assumptions about what did and did not qualify as appropriate antimicrobial use. 9,10 Furthermore, the large sample size from the national data analysis was validated by medical record review. Overall, there was excellent agreement between these 2 data sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing postoperative UTIs is well-established, there is evidence to suggest significant variation in utilization of antibiotic prophylaxis, including inappropriate selection of drugs, improper timing of administration, and excessive duration of prophylaxis. 3 We should all use these guidelines as a framework to plan our local strategies based on our hospital or communities' antibiogram, keeping in mind that proper antibiotic stewardship is critical to slowing the rise of resistant organisms and reducing significant future risk for our patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%