MS pathology is potentially orchestrated by autoreactive T cells, but the antigens recognized remain unknown. A novel APC/T-cell platform was developed to determine intrathecal CD4+ and CD8 + T-cell responses to candidate MS-associated autoantigens (cMSAg) in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS, n = 7) and MS (n = 6) patients. Human cMSAg encoding open reading frames (n = 8) were cloned into an Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-based vector to express cMSAg at high levels in EBV-transformed B-cells (BLCLs). Human cMSAg cloned were myelin-associated and -oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, myelin basic protein, proteolipid protein, ATP-dependent potassium channel ATP-dependent inwards rectifying potassium channel 4.1, S100 calcium-binding protein B, contactin-2, and neurofascin. Transduced BLCLs were used as autologous APC in functional T-cell assays to determine cMSAg-specific T-cell frequencies in cerebrospinal fluid derived T-cell lines (CSF-TCLs) by intracellular IFN-Îł flow cytometry. Whereas all CSF-TCL responded strongly to mitogenic stimulation, no substantial T-cell reactivity to cMSAg was observed. Contrastingly, measles virus fusion protein-specific CD4 + and CD8 + T-cell clones, used as control of the APC/T-cell platform, efficiently recognized transduced BLCL expressing their cognate antigen. The inability to detect substantial T-cell reactivity to eight human endogenously synthesized cMSAg in autologous APC do not support their role as prominent intrathecal T-cell target antigens in CIS and MS patients early after onset of disease. (MOG) and proteolipid protein (PLP), glia-specific proteins like inwards rectifying potassium channel (KIR4.1, ATP-dependent inwards rectifying potassium channel 4.1) and S100 calcium-binding protein (S100B) and neuron-specific proteins like contactin-2 (CNTN2) and neurofascin 155kD isoform (NFASC) [1,2]. The majority of studies detailing cMSAg-specific T cells in MS patients assayed peripheral blood with conflicting outcome [1,2]. Some observed increased auto-reactive T-cell frequencies in MS, while others described equivalent numbers in patients and controls questioning their role in MS [3]. The poor correlation between blood and intrathecal T-cell phenotypes, and TCR repertoires [4] dispute extrapolation of systemic T-cell data to MS immunopathology.Most studies assayed intrathecal cMSAg-specific T-cell responses using autologous PBMC, pulsed with synthetic peptides or recombinant (animal) cMSAg, as APC [2]. This strategy has several limitations [2,3]. First, cMSAg of different species and bacterial-produced antigens have a different amino acid composition and conformation compared with native human cMSAg, respectively, which potentially affect processing and presentation of the cognate epitope [5]. Second, peptide binding is highly HLA allele-specific. Distinct HLA alleles are dominant MS risk or even protective factors [1]. Thus, differences in cMSAg T-cell responses in MS patients and controls may be due to intercohort HLA genotype disparity [1] ensuing mandatory HLA matching of pa...