2014
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbes are not bound by sociobiology: Response to Kümmerli and Ross‐Gillespie (2013)

Abstract: In recent years, sociobiology has been extended to microorganisms. Viewed through this lens, the microbial world is replete with cooperative behaviors. However, little attention has been paid to alternate hypotheses, making many studies self-confirming.Somewhat apart is a recent analysis of pyoverdin production-a paradigmatic public good and social trait-by Pseudomonas, which has revealed discord between predictions arising from sociobiology and the biology of microbes. This led the authors, Zhang and Rainey (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A particularly pressing issue concerns the ecological significance of adhesive traits in environments where expression of these traits is subject to gene regulation (Gal et al, 2003;Giddens et al, 2007), as opposed to overexpression upon mutational activation, which is the norm in laboratory models of evolution. This requires that the mechanistic insight stemming from use of microbial model systems be applied to natural communities (Rainey et al, 2014), where, despite their often daunting complexity, there exists opportunity to explore the contribution of ecological differences among species to community structure, function and evolution (Jessup et al, 2004).…”
Section: Evolutionary Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particularly pressing issue concerns the ecological significance of adhesive traits in environments where expression of these traits is subject to gene regulation (Gal et al, 2003;Giddens et al, 2007), as opposed to overexpression upon mutational activation, which is the norm in laboratory models of evolution. This requires that the mechanistic insight stemming from use of microbial model systems be applied to natural communities (Rainey et al, 2014), where, despite their often daunting complexity, there exists opportunity to explore the contribution of ecological differences among species to community structure, function and evolution (Jessup et al, 2004).…”
Section: Evolutionary Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Siderophores, by necessity, are secreted, and there has been interest in and debate over the cooperative nature of siderophore production (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). In the simplest case, a siderophore, once secreted, is available to all members of a community.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our argument of noncooperativity in a public goods‐mediated microbial behavior is also relevant beyond predation. For instance, bacterial iron acquisition is mediated by secretion of public siderophores but whether it is actually a cooperative behavior has been debated recently . Computational models of public goods‐mediated behaviors also suggest that such behaviors can be noncooperative in different ecological contexts …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is certainly not straightforward to apply the lessons learned from animal cooperativity to microbial systems. Although a thorough treatment of this subject is beyond our word limit, some excellent reviews and discussions are available …”
Section: A Variety Of Mechanisms Allow the Evolution Of Cooperativitymentioning
confidence: 99%