2014
DOI: 10.1111/vru.12200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Two Different Anesthetic Protocols on Cardiac Flow Measured by Two Dimensional Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract: Companion animals are anesthetized or heavily sedated to comply for cardiac MRI and different anesthetic protocols are expected to have variable effects on functional parameters measured. This study compared two anesthetic protocols (Protocol A: Midazolam, fentanyl; Protocol B: Dexmedetomidine) for their effect on quantitative and qualitative analysis of blood flow through the aortic, pulmonic, mitral and tricuspid valves using 2D phase contrast (PC) MRI in dogs. Mean flow per heartbeat through the pulmonary a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
25
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(92 reference statements)
2
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a standardized anesthetic protocol was not used thus variations in aortic flow could have altered coronary artery imaging. However, previous publications evaluating coronary anatomy during CT angiography and aortic flow based on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, found no significant difference between the two anesthetic protocols that were studied …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In addition, a standardized anesthetic protocol was not used thus variations in aortic flow could have altered coronary artery imaging. However, previous publications evaluating coronary anatomy during CT angiography and aortic flow based on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, found no significant difference between the two anesthetic protocols that were studied …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Although echocardiography is commonly conducted with the patient awake, sedation or general anesthesia is typically necessary to allow for patient restraint during the image acquisition using CT and MRI. The effect of different drug protocols may alter the functional or anatomical variables determined from CT and MRI examinations and has therefore been the subject of several publications . Similarly, cross‐modality correlation and the need for establishment of reference values has prompted several publications, including the first cross‐sectional study published in VRU in 2005 by MacDonald et al using MRI to quality left ventricular mass compared to echocardiography in cats .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heart and especially the coronary arteries of our companion animals are much smaller compared to our human counterparts, and heart rates are much higher. These factors indicate the need for high spatial resolution while maintaining rapid scan acquisition; hence, several investigations used advanced multidetector CT units (eg, 64 MDCT) and high‐field MRI (eg, 3T) to establish the feasibility to image these small and fast‐moving structures . Electrocardiographic (ECG) gating is used to match the phase of image acquisition to the phase of the cardiac cycle and is necessary to perform functional evaluation of the heart, using planar and volumetric measurements .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations