2014
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Proto-MHC of Placozoans, a Region Specialized in Cellular Stress and Ubiquitination/Proteasome Pathways

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intracellular domain (ID) of BTN3A1 and BTN3A3 belongs to the B30.2 family ( 85 , 86 ) and is often found in proteins involved in innate immunity. This includes even molecules encoded by genes found in the hypothetical “proto MHC” of placozoa, which form the most basal branch of Metazoa ( 87 ). The BTN3A2 molecule has a truncated intracellular B30.2-negative domain.…”
Section: Btn3 Is Mandatory For Pag-mediated Activation Of Vγ9vδ2 T Cementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intracellular domain (ID) of BTN3A1 and BTN3A3 belongs to the B30.2 family ( 85 , 86 ) and is often found in proteins involved in innate immunity. This includes even molecules encoded by genes found in the hypothetical “proto MHC” of placozoa, which form the most basal branch of Metazoa ( 87 ). The BTN3A2 molecule has a truncated intracellular B30.2-negative domain.…”
Section: Btn3 Is Mandatory For Pag-mediated Activation Of Vγ9vδ2 T Cementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genes that were originally identified as being paralogous (Kasahara 1997) are located within a 3.2-Mb region in the MHC on human chromosome 6 but are spread over roughly 21 to 76 Mb in each of the paralogous regions, with these paralogous genes separated by many tens of other genes that are not obviously paralogous (as found by locating these genes in ENSEMBL). More recent analyses, taking into account other organisms (Kasahara 2000; Abi-Rached et al 2002; Azumi et al 2003; Danchin and Pontarotti 2004; Kasahara et al 2004; Suurväli et al 2014), improve but do not substantially change this view (with interesting details outside the scope of this review). The selective identification of genes considered to be paralogous in a sea of genes that are not obviously paralogous (particularly for genes that are part of a large multigene family with members throughout the genome) certainly led to skepticism for the early claims for two rounds of genome-wide duplication at the base of the vertebrates (for instance, Hughes 1998), which was largely dispelled once the amphioxus genome became available (Putnam et al 2008).…”
Section: The Genomic Location Of Cd1 Genes Varies In Different Speciesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This finding is most easily accommodated by the CD1 genes being part of the region before duplication, but it remains possible that the CD1 genes were inserted into the middle of an existing paralogous region. In contrast, the FcRn gene is located at one end of the 47-Mb region containing the paralogous genes on chromosome 19, relatively far away (and across the centromere) from the bulk of those paralogous genes (particularly as determined by later analyses, for instance Suurväli et al 2014). Thus, examination of the human genome does not rule out any of the proposed models but it would seem most parsimonious for CD1 genes to be present before the genome-wide duplications and consistent with FcRn gene appearing later in evolution.…”
Section: The Genomic Location Of Cd1 Genes Varies In Different Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While TRIM genes are present across metazoans, the implication in antiviral immunity of the few trim genes found in the genomes of basal branches of metazoans or in invertebrates (5, 23, 24, 48) remains unknown. Interestingly, these trim mostly belong to the class 1 (domain structure: RBCC-COS-Fn3-B302), which enhances the RIG I pathway in human (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6, 22). TRIMs involved in basic cellular functions often belong to the most ancient subsets, e.g., RBCC-Cos-Fn3-B30.2 TRIM, which were already present in early metazoans (23) and are found both in vertebrates and invertebrates (24). Only a few trim genes are generally present in the genome of invertebrates, while the family greatly expanded in vertebrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%