2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2014.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of avian species to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand 6-formylindolo [3,2-b] carbazole (FICZ)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although mammalian and axolotl AHRs exhibit dramatic differences in sensitivity to transactivation by TCDD, the EC 50 values for the candidate endogenous ligand FICZ are much more similar. This observation mimics those made previously for frog 26, 57 and bird 65 AHRs. This differential ligand response is consistent with recent mutagenesis and functional activity studies demonstrating that FICZ can bind within the LBD of the mouse AHR in a fashion different than that of TCDD and related HAHs 78 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although mammalian and axolotl AHRs exhibit dramatic differences in sensitivity to transactivation by TCDD, the EC 50 values for the candidate endogenous ligand FICZ are much more similar. This observation mimics those made previously for frog 26, 57 and bird 65 AHRs. This differential ligand response is consistent with recent mutagenesis and functional activity studies demonstrating that FICZ can bind within the LBD of the mouse AHR in a fashion different than that of TCDD and related HAHs 78 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The EC 50 for transactivation of axolotl AHR by FICZ, a candidate endogenous agonist 57, 58 , was also greater than that of the chimeric AHR (Figure 5, Table 1), although as observed previously for the X. laevis 26, 57 and bird 65 AHRs, the difference is much less pronounced, about 45-fold following 3 h exposure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Recent studies have shown that transactivation potencies of FICZ are greater than TCDD regardless of the avian AHR1 genotype2033. In addition, there are fewer inter-species differences in AHR1 sensitivity to this endogenous ligand33, whereas there are large differences in responses to TCDD of the AHR1 among species2024. Our previous study also supported that there was no linkage between avian AHR1 genotypes and AHR1-mediated responses to FICZ34.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The ability of FICZ to activate AHR signaling appears to be evolutionarily conserved. FICZ has been shown to bind and activate AHRs in different vertebrate species in addition to human, including mouse, African clawed frog ( Xenopus laevis ), zebrafish ( Danio rerio ) and several avian species [16-20]. Furthermore, recent studies suggest that FICZ-AHR and TCDD-AHR interactions are distinct.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, recent studies suggest that FICZ-AHR and TCDD-AHR interactions are distinct. For example, avian species known to differ in response to TCDD show no significant differences in sensitivity to FICZ [20], and FICZ differs from TCDD in its ability to bind AHR variants with certain mutated amino acids in the ligand-binding domain [21]. Such results emphasize the robustness of the FICZ-AHR interaction and further suggest that FICZ could have a role as an important natural signaling molecule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%