Time-of-Day- and Light-Dependent Expression of Ubiquitin Protein Ligase E3 Component N-Recognin 4 (UBR4) in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Circadian Clock
Abstract:Circadian rhythms of behavior and physiology are driven by the biological clock that operates endogenously but can also be entrained to the light-dark cycle of the environment. In mammals, the master circadian pacemaker is located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), which is composed of individual cellular oscillators that are driven by a set of core clock genes interacting in transcriptional/translational feedback loops. Light signals can trigger molecular events in the SCN that ultimately impact on the pha… Show more
“…UBR4 and POE are broadly expressed in the murine and fly brains, including virtually all SCN neurons and the PDF-positive LN v s [170]. A prior study demonstrated that the abundance of UBR4 in the SCN is both rhythmic and light-inducible, suggesting that it may regulate clock-timing processes or photic entrainment [171]. However, ablating Ubr4 in all GABAergic neurons, and thus all SCN neurons, has no effect on free-running rhythms under DD or light-induced phase delays in mice [170].…”
Section: The Roles Of N-recognins In Circadian Rhythmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of N-recognins, only UBR1 and UBR4 have been implicated in the regulation of circadian rhythms [170][171][172]. In the case of UBR1, it was shown to induce the degradation of CONIDIAL SEPARATION 1 (CSP1), a Neurospora protein whose presence in the morning represses the transcription of evening-specific genes [172].…”
Section: The Roles Of N-recognins In Circadian Rhythmsmentioning
Circadian clocks evolved to enable organisms to anticipate and prepare for periodic environmental changes driven by the day–night cycle. This internal timekeeping mechanism is built on autoregulatory transcription–translation feedback loops that control the rhythmic expression of core clock genes and their protein products. The levels of clock proteins rise and ebb throughout a 24-h period through their rhythmic synthesis and destruction. In the ubiquitin–proteasome system, the process of polyubiquitination, or the covalent attachment of a ubiquitin chain, marks a protein for degradation by the 26S proteasome. The process is regulated by E3 ubiquitin ligases, which recognize specific substrates for ubiquitination. In this review, we summarize the roles that known E3 ubiquitin ligases play in the circadian clocks of two popular model organisms: mice and fruit flies. We also discuss emerging evidence that implicates the N-degron pathway, an alternative proteolytic system, in the regulation of circadian rhythms. We conclude the review with our perspectives on the potential for the proteolytic and non-proteolytic functions of E3 ubiquitin ligases within the circadian clock system.
“…UBR4 and POE are broadly expressed in the murine and fly brains, including virtually all SCN neurons and the PDF-positive LN v s [170]. A prior study demonstrated that the abundance of UBR4 in the SCN is both rhythmic and light-inducible, suggesting that it may regulate clock-timing processes or photic entrainment [171]. However, ablating Ubr4 in all GABAergic neurons, and thus all SCN neurons, has no effect on free-running rhythms under DD or light-induced phase delays in mice [170].…”
Section: The Roles Of N-recognins In Circadian Rhythmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of N-recognins, only UBR1 and UBR4 have been implicated in the regulation of circadian rhythms [170][171][172]. In the case of UBR1, it was shown to induce the degradation of CONIDIAL SEPARATION 1 (CSP1), a Neurospora protein whose presence in the morning represses the transcription of evening-specific genes [172].…”
Section: The Roles Of N-recognins In Circadian Rhythmsmentioning
Circadian clocks evolved to enable organisms to anticipate and prepare for periodic environmental changes driven by the day–night cycle. This internal timekeeping mechanism is built on autoregulatory transcription–translation feedback loops that control the rhythmic expression of core clock genes and their protein products. The levels of clock proteins rise and ebb throughout a 24-h period through their rhythmic synthesis and destruction. In the ubiquitin–proteasome system, the process of polyubiquitination, or the covalent attachment of a ubiquitin chain, marks a protein for degradation by the 26S proteasome. The process is regulated by E3 ubiquitin ligases, which recognize specific substrates for ubiquitination. In this review, we summarize the roles that known E3 ubiquitin ligases play in the circadian clocks of two popular model organisms: mice and fruit flies. We also discuss emerging evidence that implicates the N-degron pathway, an alternative proteolytic system, in the regulation of circadian rhythms. We conclude the review with our perspectives on the potential for the proteolytic and non-proteolytic functions of E3 ubiquitin ligases within the circadian clock system.
“…Ubiquitin protein ligase E3 component N‐recognin 4 (UBR4) is an E3 ligase of the N‐end rule pathway with a potential role in PER2 ubiquitination and degradation. UBR4 protein peaks with a phase that coincides with the beginning of PER2 degradation in the SCN (early night) (Ling et al., 2014). More research will be needed to define the implication of this ubiquitin ligase in clock function.…”
Section: Ubiquitination and Deubiquitination In The Clock Of Mammalsmentioning
Circadian clocks are internal timing systems that enable organisms to adjust their behavioral and physiological rhythms to the daily changes of their environment. These clocks generate self‐sustained oscillations at the cellular, tissue, and behavioral level. The rhythm‐generating mechanism is based on a gene expression network with a delayed negative feedback loop that causes the transcripts to oscillate with a period of approximately 24 hr. This oscillatory nature of the proteins involved in this network necessitates that they are intrinsically unstable, with a short half‐life. Hence, post‐translational modifications (PTMs) are important to precisely time the presence, absence, and interactions of these proteins at appropriate times of the day. Ubiquitination and deubiquitination are counter‐balancing PTMs which play a key role in this regulatory process. In this review, we take a comprehensive look at the roles played by the processes of ubiquitination and deubiquitination in the clock machinery of the most commonly studied eukaryotic models of the circadian clock: plants, fungi, fruit flies, and mammals. We present the effects exerted by ubiquitinating and deubiquitinating enzymes on the stability, but also the activity, localization, and interactions of clock proteins. Overall, these PTMs have key roles in regulating not only the pace of the circadian clocks but also their response to external cues and their control of cellular functions.
“…Up to now, research on UBR4 has mainly focused on the nervous system ( 5 – 7 ). Interestingly, the number of Drosophila pupae decreased after Ubr4 gene knockdown in our preliminary experiments, suggesting that Ubr4 may be related to reproductive capacity.…”
IntroductionIt has been established that UBR4 encodes E3 ubiquitin ligase, which determines the specificity of substrate binding during protein ubiquitination and has been associated with various functions of the nervous system but not the reproductive system. Herein, we explored the role of UBR4 on fertility with a Drosophila model.MethodsDifferent Ubr4 knockdown flies were established using the UAS/GAL4 activating sequence system. Fertility, hatchability, and testis morphology were studied, and bioinformatics analyses were conducted. Our results indicated that UBR4 deficiency could induce male sterility and influent egg hatchability in Drosophila.ResultsWe found that Ubr4 deficiency affected the testis during morphological analysis. Proteomics analysis indicated 188 upregulated proteins and 175 downregulated proteins in the testis of Ubr4 knockdown flies. Gene Ontology analysis revealed significant upregulation of CG11598 and Sfp65A, and downregulation of Pelota in Ubr4 knockdown flies. These proteins were involved in the biometabolic or reproductive process in Drosophila. These regulated proteins are important in testis generation and sperm storage promotion. Bioinformatics analysis verified that UBR4 was low expressed in cryptorchidism patients, which further supported the important role of UBR4 in male fertility.DiscussionOverall, our findings suggest that UBR4 deficiency could promote male infertility and may be involved in the protein modification of UBR4 by upregulating Sfp65A and CG11598, whereas downregulating Pelota protein expression.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.