2014
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-0742(13)60508-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the sources and composition of the incremental excess of fine particles across multiple sampling locations in one air shed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ROS-specific sources including the zinc and lead factors had a moderate to strong correlation with cytokine production ( r = 0.63–0.80), while the secondary source was moderately correlated with cytokine levels ( r = 0.45–0.60) (Table ). This finding supports results from previous studies conducted in Beijing and cities in the North America , where mortality was significantly affected by air pollution with fine PM and their specific components (e.g., sulfates and nitrates). In addition, industrial sources that emit high concentrations of zinc and lead could also lead to decreases in an anti-inflammatory effect .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ROS-specific sources including the zinc and lead factors had a moderate to strong correlation with cytokine production ( r = 0.63–0.80), while the secondary source was moderately correlated with cytokine levels ( r = 0.45–0.60) (Table ). This finding supports results from previous studies conducted in Beijing and cities in the North America , where mortality was significantly affected by air pollution with fine PM and their specific components (e.g., sulfates and nitrates). In addition, industrial sources that emit high concentrations of zinc and lead could also lead to decreases in an anti-inflammatory effect .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the nitrate-rich and sulfaterich factors. Studies by Chen et al (2007) and McGinnis et al (2014) also identified the major contribution of the secondary aerosol fraction to PM 2.5 . Table 3 shows the non-carcinogenic (represented as HQ) and carcinogenic risks posed by several selected metals (Pb, As, Cd, Cu, Mn, Zn, and Ni) in PM 2.5 mass concentration through inhalation exposure associated with sources.…”
Section: Identification and Apportionment Of Pm 25 Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These plants use coal as the raw material to generate electric power. Other researchers have also used As a tracer for the coal burning source (Moreno et al, 2013) and As and Se by Meij and te Winkel (2007) and Querol et al (1995). As and Se are categorized as of great concern and Ba and Sr are of moderate environmental concern in the utilization of coal, as reported by Vejahati et al (2010).…”
Section: Identification and Apportionment Of Pm 25 Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no study has quantified the levels of EPFRs in airborne PM during haze events, so whether the haze events noticeably increase the EPFR levels in airborne PM has remained unclear. Different-sized PM may reach dissimilar depths of the respiratory system and lead to differential health effects. It has also been demonstrated that the toxicity of PM with varying sizes and compositions is different. , Previous studies have also confirmed different loads of notorious toxic persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in airborne fine particles of various sizes. , Therefore, it is vital to clarify the levels and particle-size distributions of EPFRs in airborne PM with the aim of better understanding the potential health risks owing to air inhalation of EPFRs in airborne fine particles, especially during haze events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%