2014
DOI: 10.5606/kbbihtisas.2014.78642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epistaxis management: is medical intervention required for inactive epistaxis?

Abstract: Our study result show that endonasal endoscopic mucosal cauterization is an effective method for resistant-to-treatment cases and inactive bleeding on admission is not a restraint for further examination.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(28 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the bleeding point of epistaxis, our data also showed Kiesselbach's plexus as the most commonly observed site, as previously reported [1,2,3,4]. Anterior packing and cauterization were therefore mainly performed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As the bleeding point of epistaxis, our data also showed Kiesselbach's plexus as the most commonly observed site, as previously reported [1,2,3,4]. Anterior packing and cauterization were therefore mainly performed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…As shown in some previous reports, the most influential general risk factor in our study was hypertension [1,4,7,11]. Although hypertension itself might not cause epistaxis, the epistaxis accompanying hypertension is difficult to treat once it occurs [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations