2014
DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.1584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How proteins bind macrocycles

Abstract: The potential utility of synthetic macrocycles as drugs, particularly against low druggability targets such as protein-protein interactions, has been widely discussed. There is little information, however, to guide the design of macrocycles for good target protein-binding activity or bioavailability. To address this knowledge gap we analyze the binding modes of a representative set of macrocycle-protein complexes. The results, combined with consideration of the physicochemical properties of approved macrocycli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
414
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 357 publications
(429 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
414
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…To achieve all three of these goals without compromising synthetic efficiency or relevance to complex natural products, we were attracted to cyclodepsipeptides, in which biological activity is quite diverse (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). Herein, we report rapid access to size-diverse collections of cyclooligodepsipeptides using a controlled oligomerization/macrocyclization sequence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve all three of these goals without compromising synthetic efficiency or relevance to complex natural products, we were attracted to cyclodepsipeptides, in which biological activity is quite diverse (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). Herein, we report rapid access to size-diverse collections of cyclooligodepsipeptides using a controlled oligomerization/macrocyclization sequence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, they usually have lower ligand efficiencies when binding to flator groove-shaped sites than traditional Ro5 compliant drugs binding to pockets or internal sites; an observation that should be kept in mind when prioritizing ligands for difficult targets [5]. Importantly, the physicochemical nature of bRo5 drugbinding interfaces are similar to the surface of the compounds as a whole, and to the surface of Ro5 compliant drugs, suggesting that the same approaches for property-based lead optimization can be used in both chemical spaces [3,5].…”
Section: Opportunities For Difficult Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, rod-shaped non-macrocyclic compounds in bRo5 space are ideal for binding to large grooveshaped binding sites, for instance those of PPI [4]. Independent of their chemotype, oral drugs in bRo5 space may bury up to 800-900 Å 2 of ligand surface area when binding to their target, that is, a surface area approaching that of a PPI interface [3,5]. Just as regular Ro5 compliant drugs, drugs in bRo5 space usually display a K d /IC 50 of 1-100 nM for binding to their targets.…”
Section: Opportunities For Difficult Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations