2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of PCR-amplifiable DNA by ethylene oxide treatment of forensic consumables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). This result is unusual and not demonstrated by prior studies exploring similar effects [17,18,[38][39][40]42]. It is unlikely that inherent template damage or cellular function is responsible for these observations, since the doses applied are beyond those expected to initiate any adaptive DNA repair response [45][46][47].…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2). This result is unusual and not demonstrated by prior studies exploring similar effects [17,18,[38][39][40]42]. It is unlikely that inherent template damage or cellular function is responsible for these observations, since the doses applied are beyond those expected to initiate any adaptive DNA repair response [45][46][47].…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The robustness of STRs to γ-radiation has been demon-378 strated for several STR kits and cell substrates (e.g. blood, 379 saliva) capable of full profiles up to 50 kGy [18,38,39].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although such contamination may occur incidentally, investigation-related contamination can be controlled and should be prevented by effective countermeasures. Among DNA decontamination techniques in forensic science, 4,5,1012 autoclaving and UV irradiation are prevalent and easy to use in laboratory settings. Our results indicate that the combination of autoclaving and UV irradiation is a more effective optional countermeasure for prevention of amplified STR product contamination in routine cleaning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have evaluated the effectiveness of sterilisation techniques for DNA decontamination, including ultraviolet (UV), gamma and electron-beam irradiation, ethylene oxide treatment and autoclaving. 4,5,813 Autoclaving and UV irradiation are easy-to-use methods, widely applied for eliminating DNA prior to use of instruments and consumables in forensic laboratories. Gefrides et al 4 reported that autoclaving for 120 min at 121°C eliminated PCR-amplifiable DNA from 10 µL of dried saliva.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of DNA quantity for degraded samples was subject to error due to the amplicon length used for the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based quantitation [4]. As alternative to the quantitation, theĤ proxy proposed by Tvedebrink et al [1] calculated from the peak height has been used as an indicator for the amount of DNA.Ĥ is defined by the sum of all peak heights from a given known profile divided by the sum of the number of heterozygous and homozygous genotypes (homozygous are multiplied by two).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%