2014
DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2014.941054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of all-cause mortality with pioglitazone and insulin in type 2 diabetes: an expanded analysis from a retrospective cohort study

Abstract: PIO was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality than INS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There were 597 deaths in the study cohort over an average 4.5 years of follow-up time. Yang et al ’s observational study17 comparing first time users of insulin or pioglitazone in a US claims database also found a statistically significant decrease in risk of all-cause mortality in the pioglitazone cohort compared with the insulin cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There were 597 deaths in the study cohort over an average 4.5 years of follow-up time. Yang et al ’s observational study17 comparing first time users of insulin or pioglitazone in a US claims database also found a statistically significant decrease in risk of all-cause mortality in the pioglitazone cohort compared with the insulin cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Fewer deaths contributed to the primary and secondary endpoint in the pioglitazone arm than the placebo arm. An observational study using US claims data found a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients with T2DM prescribed pioglitazone compared with insulin (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.36) 17. More recently, a cohort study using data from a UK primary care database showed a decreased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.88), heart failure (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.95) and cardiovascular (CV) disease (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.00) with use of glitazones in T2DM compared with non-use of these agents 18.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that patients receiving any other anti-diabetic medications, including TZDs, were excluded from the study, and thus the likely effect of TZDs to reduce insulin requirements was not evaluated. Another very recent industry-funded retrospective cohort study did compare TZD to insulin and found that patients started on pioglitazone from 2000–2010 had a remarkably significant 67% lower all-cause mortality than those started on insulin (Yang et al, 2014), though this study was unable to adjust for glycemic control.…”
Section: Why Does It Matter? the Case For Reducing Insulin Levelsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The combination of metformin and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) γ agonist pioglitazone, a drug from the thiazolidinedione family, provided superior clinical outcomes to metformin alone [ 5 ]. In spite of the beneficial effects of thiazolidinediones on glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, inflammation and oxidative stress [ 2 , 4 , 5 ], as well as their triacylglycerol-lowering effect in both humans [ 5 ] and mice [ 6 , 7 ], clinical use of pioglitazone has declined recently due to the risk of its side-effects (reviewed in [ 1 , 8 ]). However, this risk could be outweighed by the benefits of pioglitazone in prevention of cardiovascular disease [ 9 ], the leading cause of death in patients with T2D [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this risk could be outweighed by the benefits of pioglitazone in prevention of cardiovascular disease [ 9 ], the leading cause of death in patients with T2D [ 10 ]. Indeed, pioglitazone is associated with a relatively low risk of all-cause mortality (reviewed in [ 8 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%