2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SnowyOwl: accurate prediction of fungal genes by using RNA-Seq and homology information to select among ab initio models

Abstract: BackgroundLocating the protein-coding genes in novel genomes is essential to understanding and exploiting the genomic information but it is still difficult to accurately predict all the genes. The recent availability of detailed information about transcript structure from high-throughput sequencing of messenger RNA (RNA-Seq) delineates many expressed genes and promises increased accuracy in gene prediction. Computational gene predictors have been intensively developed for and tested in well-studied animal geno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…lipolytica database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/); 2) Yeast Genome Annotation Pipeline (YGAP) [21]; and 3) SnowyOwl fungal genome analysis [22] (Materials and Methods, Fig 2). The results of this analysis are summarized in Fig 3 and Table 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lipolytica database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/); 2) Yeast Genome Annotation Pipeline (YGAP) [21]; and 3) SnowyOwl fungal genome analysis [22] (Materials and Methods, Fig 2). The results of this analysis are summarized in Fig 3 and Table 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ab initio gene prediction programs included in the benchmark study are based on statistical models that are trained using known proteins and genes, and typically perform well at predicting conserved or well-studied genes [33,38]. However, ab initio prediction accuracy has been previously shown to decrease in some special cases, such as small proteins [39], organism-specific genes or other unusual genes [40][41][42]. Our goal was therefore to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the programs, but also to highlight genomic and protein characteristics that could be incorporated to improve the prediction models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sister tool GeneMark-ES requires only the genome itself for training [13] but may be less accurate. SnowyOwl [14] is a training and annotation pipeline that was tested on fungi and that combines initial transcript models from assembled RNA-Seq data and GeneMark-ES to train AUGUSTUS, subsequently, genes are predicted with AUGUSTUS and RNA-Seq hints and the resulting gene models are combined with GeneMark-ES predictions.…”
Section: Training Of Gene Findersmentioning
confidence: 99%