2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.112.221102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clear and Measurable Signature of Modified Gravity in the Galaxy Velocity Field

Abstract: Reprinted with permission from the American Physical Society: Physical Review Letters 112, 22, 221102 c 2014 by the American Physical Society. Readers may view, browse, and/or download material for temporary copying purposes only, provided these uses are for noncommercial personal purposes. Except as provided by law, this material may not be further reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modied, adapted, performed, displayed, published, or sold in whole or part, without prior written permission from the America… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
82
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
3
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 shows that the enhancement of ∆P θθ /P θθ for these models relative to ΛCDM is a lot stronger than that in the matter power spectra -to almost an order of magnitude in the case of F6. This reiterates the aforementioned advantage of using the velocity divergence power spectrum as a more sensitive probe of modified gravity [26]. Just as in the case of the matter power spectrum, there does not seem to be any significant difference in the enhancements when including time derivatives, as both the non-static and quasi-static simulations of the three models seem to be well-converged.…”
Section: Low-resolution Testsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…3 shows that the enhancement of ∆P θθ /P θθ for these models relative to ΛCDM is a lot stronger than that in the matter power spectra -to almost an order of magnitude in the case of F6. This reiterates the aforementioned advantage of using the velocity divergence power spectrum as a more sensitive probe of modified gravity [26]. Just as in the case of the matter power spectrum, there does not seem to be any significant difference in the enhancements when including time derivatives, as both the non-static and quasi-static simulations of the three models seem to be well-converged.…”
Section: Low-resolution Testsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This suggests that probing galactic halos well beyond their virial radii, out to their caustic-crossing or turn-around radii, is more likely to pick up differences between LCDM and models with a Vainshtein screening mechanism (see also [51][52][53][54]). …”
Section: Fig 6: Same Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The galaxy velocity field could also be a decisive probe to test modified gravity theories, as advocated in (Zu 2013;Hellwing et al 2014). However, this probe would require to have a correct modelling of the Galileon model nonlinearities.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%