2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-014-0359-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nasal Splinting: A Plaster Modification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rationale behind this is to preserve and protect the desired shape of the nasal tip and dorsum, especially during the first weeks of the recovery period. 1 More recently, several authors have proposed different alternatives for nasal splinting, to avoid the nuisance for the surgeon and the patient that implies molding and using the plaster for at least 2 weeks. 2 The list of suggested materials includes thermoplastic, metal, fiberglass, 3 and acrylic 4 splints, each one with its singular pros and cons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale behind this is to preserve and protect the desired shape of the nasal tip and dorsum, especially during the first weeks of the recovery period. 1 More recently, several authors have proposed different alternatives for nasal splinting, to avoid the nuisance for the surgeon and the patient that implies molding and using the plaster for at least 2 weeks. 2 The list of suggested materials includes thermoplastic, metal, fiberglass, 3 and acrylic 4 splints, each one with its singular pros and cons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the first weeks of recovery, the nasal shape of the tip and dorsum has to be protected with a splint [11]. In accordance with the specialized literature, the ideal splint should be light, adaptable, easy to remove and inexpensive [12]. The nasal splint involves molding and a plaster that should be used for at least 2 weeks using materials such as thermoplastic [13], fiberglass, metal or acr ylic splints [14][15][16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%