Twelve‐month post‐injury outcomes for Māori and non‐Māori: findings from a New Zealand cohort study

Maclennan, Brett; Wyeth, Emma; Davie, Gabrielle; Wilson, Suzanne; Derrett, Sarah

doi:10.1111/1753-6405.12228

Cited by 20 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A recent report showed that the rate of health-related loss due to injury for Māori is at least twice that of non-Māori 21. We found that Māori have poorer outcomes 12 months after the sentinel injury,22 and are at 70% increased risk of disability 24 months after the sentinel injury compared to non-Māori 23. These findings are concerning and warrant urgent attention.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 79%

Subsequent Injury Study (SInS): Improving outcomes for injured New Zealanders

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Subsequent Injury Study (SInS) will deliver information about the risks, protective factors and outcomes related to SI for New Zealanders. As a result of sourcing injury data from New Zealand's 'all injury' insurer ACC, SInS includes people who have been hospitalised and not hospitalised for injury. Consequently, SInS will provide insights that are novel internationally as other studies are usually confined to examining trauma registries, specific injuries or injured workers who are covered by a workplace insurer rather than a 'real-world' injury population.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 79%

Subsequent Injury Study (SInS): Improving outcomes for injured New Zealanders

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While these sources included Indigenous populations they were excluded, as they did not focus on cost of disability. The eight excluded studies concerned: cost-effectiveness of health care interventions (Angell, Muhunthan, Irving, Eades, & Jan, 2014), healthcare preferences of Elders and care workers (Browne, Mokuau, Ka'opua, Kim, Higuchi, & Braun, 2014), identification and prevention of disability, and service access (DiGiacomo et al, 2013), experiences of parents and carers in accessing disability support services for their child(ren) (Green, Abbott, Delaney, Patradoon-Ho, Delaney, Davidson, & DiGiacomo, 2016), post-injury outcomes (Maclennan, Wyeth, Davie, Wilson, & Derrett, 2014), and burden of disease and injury (Zhao, Guthridge, Magnus, & Vos, 2004;Vos, Barker, Begg, Stanley, & Lopez, 2009;Zhao, Condon, Guthridge, & You, 2010).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Cost of Disability for Indigenous People: A Systematic Review

Lakhani

Cullen

Townsend

2017

Journal of Social Inclusion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is expected that Indigenous people experience asymmetric disability costs compared to non-Indigenous people. No systematic review has investigated the cost of disability for Indigenous people. A systematic review can contribute to the evidence base and inform the health and social care services that Indigenous people with disability receive. Thus, this systematic review aimed to: (i) provide insight into the distinct cost of disability for Indigenous people and (ii) summarise the current state of knowledge concerning the cost of disability for Indigenous people. The PRISMA approach was applied and four databases-MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, CINAHL and ProQuest Social Sciences-were searched for peer-reviewed literature published before January 2017. After a removal of duplicates, the titles of 193 sources were reviewed against the inclusion criteria. Of these, eight sources were considered for a full-text review. After a full-text review, zero sources met the entire inclusion criteria. While these eight studies did not entirely meet search criteria, findings from two studies closely met the review criteria and provided insight into service considerations that may contribute to distinct costs of disability for Indigenous people. These considerations include: i) providing culturally appropriate assessments and psychometric tools for the identification and monitoring of disability, (ii) ensuring healthcare and service provider cultural training, (iii) raising community awareness around disability services, (iv) delivering holistic integrated health-care models offered locally, and (v) building relationships with families. Irrespective of these considerations, the paucity of research in the area makes it impossible clarify the cost of disability for Indigenous people. Consequently, the need for research in this area is paramount. It is imperative that future research considers the distinct costs of providing health and social care services for Indigenous people with disability. This research will favourably inform health and social care services offered to Indigenous people with disability, and furthermore contribute towards positive health and wellbeing outcomes.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, having two or more chronic conditions, difficulty accessing healthcare services for injury, being hospitalised and having inadequate household income predict disability at 24 months post-injury [26]. Alarmingly, compared to non-Māori, Māori experience higher levels of adverse outcomes (pain and discomfort, psychological distress, difficulties with mobility and usual activities) than non-Māori at 3 [22], and 12 months post-injury [27]. Māori hospitalised for injury are also 1.8 times more likely to experience disability 24 months post-injury compared to hospitalised non-Māori [25].…”

Section: The Need For Pois-10 Māori: Evidence From Our Existing Mixed-methods Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

POIS-10 Māori: Outcomes and Experiences in the Decade Following Injury

Wyeth,

Derrett,

Nelson

et al. 2021

MPs

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Injury-related disability burden extends well beyond two years post-injury, especially for Māori (Indigenous) New Zealanders. Māori also experience greater difficulty accessing health services. This prospective cohort study extension uses mixed-methods and aims to understand and identify factors contributing to long-term experiences and outcomes (positive and negative) at 12 years post-injury for injured Māori and their whānau (families), and explore the barriers and facilitators to whānau flourishing, and access to health and rehabilitation services. Five hundred and sixty-six Māori, who were injured between 2007–2009, participated in the Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study (POIS). Of these, 544 consented to long-term follow up, and will be invited to participate in a POIS-10 Māori interview at 12 years post-injury. We anticipate a 65% follow-up rate (~n = 350). Aligned with the Meihana Model, interviews will collect information about multiple inter-related dimensions. Administrative injury and hospitalisation data up to 12 years post-injury will also be collected. Regression models will be developed to examine predictors of long-term health and disability outcomes, after adjusting for a range of confounders. POIS-10 Māori will identify key points in the injury and rehabilitation pathway to inform future interventions to improve post-injury outcomes for Māori and whānau, and will highlight the support required for Māori flourishing post-injury.

show abstract

Twelve‐month post‐injury outcomes for Māori and non‐Māori: findings from a New Zealand cohort study

Cited by 20 publications

References 19 publications

Subsequent Injury Study (SInS): Improving outcomes for injured New Zealanders

Subsequent Injury Study (SInS): Improving outcomes for injured New Zealanders

The Cost of Disability for Indigenous People: A Systematic Review

POIS-10 Māori: Outcomes and Experiences in the Decade Following Injury

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About