2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous transluminal pulmonary angioplasty in elderly patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite significantly worse haemodynamic parameters at baseline, patients managed with interventional therapies (PEA or BPA) had significantly superior survival at 5 years than those treated medically (98% versus 64%, respectively; p<0.0001). The efficacy and safety of BPA were similar in younger (<65 years) and older (⩾65 years) patients [23]. Data comparing outcomes of PEA in operable patients with those of BPA in inoperable patients suggest that the efficacy and safety of the two procedures are similar in their target cohorts [35].…”
Section: History Evolution and Evidence For Bpamentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite significantly worse haemodynamic parameters at baseline, patients managed with interventional therapies (PEA or BPA) had significantly superior survival at 5 years than those treated medically (98% versus 64%, respectively; p<0.0001). The efficacy and safety of BPA were similar in younger (<65 years) and older (⩾65 years) patients [23]. Data comparing outcomes of PEA in operable patients with those of BPA in inoperable patients suggest that the efficacy and safety of the two procedures are similar in their target cohorts [35].…”
Section: History Evolution and Evidence For Bpamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Published studies of BPA are discussed below and summarised in table 1 [9,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]43]. The first full report was published in 2001 by FEINSTEIN et al [15] in the USA, describing 18 patients with inaccessible or "nonsurgical" CTEPH.…”
Section: History Evolution and Evidence For Bpamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both reports mentioned specific complications related to this procedure. Meanwhile, several Japanese centres gained their own experience in BPA using slightly different methodologies and claimed reduced complication rates while maintaining high efficacy [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. We started to perform BPA in non-operable CTEPH patients in 2013 [15,16], motivated by their expected poor survival compared with those offered surgical PEA [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 In the past decade, we and others reported that BPA improves the hemodynamics, cardiac function and prognosis of distal-type CTEPH without severe complications. [15][16][17][18][19][20] However, the effects of BPA on oxygenation in patients with inoperable CTEPH remain to be elucidated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%