2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose matters! Optimisation of guideline adherence is associated with lower mortality in stable patients with chronic heart failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
87
1
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
87
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Similarly, in the Austrian Heart Failure Registry, improved guideline adherence related to dose escalation towards optimal levels was associated with reduced long-term mortality in ambulatory HFrEF patients surviving 1 year after registration. 15 …”
Section: Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Similarly, in the Austrian Heart Failure Registry, improved guideline adherence related to dose escalation towards optimal levels was associated with reduced long-term mortality in ambulatory HFrEF patients surviving 1 year after registration. 15 …”
Section: Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are subgroup analyses supporting that mortality benefit is observed even 6.25 mg daily dose of carvedilol and 1.25-3.75 mg daily dose of bisoprolol. After initiating ACEI/ARB therapy, adding BB therapy before achieving the target dose is important in terms of mortality and morbidity (27). In a clinical trial conducted in Austria, it was demonstrated that adjusting treatment in accordance with the guidelines reduced all-cause mortality in patients with HF-REF (27).…”
Section: 8mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After initiating ACEI/ARB therapy, adding BB therapy before achieving the target dose is important in terms of mortality and morbidity (27). In a clinical trial conducted in Austria, it was demonstrated that adjusting treatment in accordance with the guidelines reduced all-cause mortality in patients with HF-REF (27). When the study group is examined, the percentage of patients who received ACEI/ARB, BB and MRA therapies were 90.5%, 87.8% and 42.7%, respectively and the percentage of patients receiving drugs in target doses was less than 50%.…”
Section: 8mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since by design only the patients who were tolerant to ACE-I were recruited to the Val-HeFT study, during the course of the study even this 7% intolerance should be disturbing. In current regitries looking for the rates of ACE-I and ARB use in HF in real life, it can be seen that ARBs are used at a rate of 20%-35% (26)(27)(28). In an evaluation made in the Cochrane database, it was detected that the rate of patients quitting the treatment because of undesired effects was 37% lower in the ARB group [RR 0.63 (95% CI 0.52, 0.76)] than in the ACE-I group (29).…”
Section: Angiotensin Receptor Blockers In Hf Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%