2014
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddu233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro screen of prion disease susceptibility genes using the scrapie cell assay

Abstract: Prion diseases (transmissible spongiform encephalopathies) are fatal neurodegenerative diseases, including Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in humans, scrapie in sheep and bovine spongiform encephalopathy in cattle. While genome-wide association studies in human and quantitative trait loci mapping in mice have provided evidence for multiple susceptibility genes, few of these have been confirmed functionally. Phenotyping mouse models is generally the method of choice. However, this is not a feasible option where many … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If any positives were reproducible, the pooled conditioned medium produced by the apparently infected cells was assayed by SCA. In parallel, PrP-silenced PK1 cells, whose Prnp expression was silenced by two shRNAs directed against the 3′-UTR and which are refractory to prion infection [ 27 ] (electronic supplementary material, figure S1), were infected with the same conditions to exclude the possibility of false positives resulting from recPrP aggregation. If the repetition experiment was successful, the formation of putative synthetic prions was assessed by standard mouse bioassay using wild-type FVB/N mice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If any positives were reproducible, the pooled conditioned medium produced by the apparently infected cells was assayed by SCA. In parallel, PrP-silenced PK1 cells, whose Prnp expression was silenced by two shRNAs directed against the 3′-UTR and which are refractory to prion infection [ 27 ] (electronic supplementary material, figure S1), were infected with the same conditions to exclude the possibility of false positives resulting from recPrP aggregation. If the repetition experiment was successful, the formation of putative synthetic prions was assessed by standard mouse bioassay using wild-type FVB/N mice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To silence Prnp expression in susceptible PK1 cells, the 19mer TAGGAGATCTTGACTCTGA was cloned into the vector pSUPER.retro.puro (Oligoengine). Sense and antisense target sequences, flanked by a hairpin, TTCAAGAGA, were inserted at the BglII and HindIII sites of pSUPER.retro.puro essentially as described previously [ 27 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies could not differentiate if the transcriptional differences were directly related to prion propagation or were simply secondary to infection, nor could they assign gene transcription status to specific cell types. Additional attempts to define the factors that affect cellular permissiveness to prion infection include transcriptomic analyses through microarray technology on cultured cells [ 12 14 ]. The results of the latter studies have provided new insights into prion infection susceptibility in a pathophysiologically relevant cell type (i.e., neurons); including the role of proteins associated with extracellular matrix remodeling [ 13 ] and others that may alter trafficking of PrP C and PrP D [ 12 ] during prion propagation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these results are not compatible with the data, which reported a significant reduction in RML prions susceptibility in a subline of N2a cells with stable Stmn2 silencing (Brown et al . ). It is conceivable that the effect of Stmn2 knockdown on prion propagation might be associated with prion strains or the clonal differences in N2a cell lines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%