Systematic Temporal Patterns in the Relationship Between Housing Development and Forest Bird Biodiversity

Abstract

As people encroach increasingly on natural areas, one question is how this affects avian biodiversity. The answer to this is partly scale-dependent. At broad scales, human populations and biodiversity concentrate in the same areas and are positively associated, but at local scales people and biodiversity are negatively associated with biodiversity. We investigated whether there is also a systematic temporal trend in the relationship between bird biodiversity and housing development. We used linear regression to examine associations between forest bird species richness and housing growth in the conterminous United States over 30 years. Our data sources were the North American Breeding Bird Survey and the 2000 decennial U.S. Census. In the 9 largest forested ecoregions, housing density increased continually over time. Across the conterminous United States, the association between bird species richness and housing density was positive for virtually all guilds except ground nesting birds. We found a systematic trajectory of declining bird species richness as housing increased through time. In more recently developed ecoregions, where housing density was still low, the association with bird species richness was neutral or positive. In ecoregions that were developed earlier and where housing density was highest, the association of housing density with bird species richness for most guilds was negative and grew stronger with advancing decades. We propose that in general the relationship between human settlement and biodiversity over time unfolds as a 2-phase process. The first phase is apparently innocuous; associations are positive due to coincidence of low-density housing with high biodiversity. The second phase is highly detrimental to biodiversity, and increases in housing density are associated with biodiversity losses. The long-term effect on biodiversity depends on the final housing density. This general pattern can help unify our understanding of the relationship of human encroachment and biodiversity response.

The more things change: species losses detected in Phoenix despite stability in bird–socioeconomic relationships

“…Similar non‐linear effects of urbanization have been found in forested regions as well (Pidgeon et al. ). Further investigation into the mechanisms underlying these species losses may reveal options for retaining some desert specialist species, and the uniqueness they contribute to a region's fauna.…”

Environmental filtering of avian communities along a rural‐to‐urban gradient in Greater Washington, D.C., USA

“…Finally, a differential avian community response to urbanization may be driven by the length of time that North American and European areas have been settled. Species in these regions may exhibit a delayed response to environmental modification in younger cities or may rebound as plant communities in older cities mature (Aronson et al 2014, Pidgeon et al 2014).…”

The importance of range edges for an irruptive species during extreme weather events

“…We chose this radius because it ensures that the entire BBS route is included, regardless of route path, and a circle has the advantage that it is of uniform area and shape, and is commonly used studies linking BBS data to landcover (e.g., Flather and Sauer 1996;Pidgeon et al 2007;Culbert et al 2013;Pidgeon et al 2014). We also calculated SPEI of the 2012 drought year for each route separately.…”