2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-014-2128-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Utero Exposure to Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Risk for Autism Spectrum Disorder

Abstract: We investigated whether there is an association between increased risk for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) used during pregnancy. This study used Denmark's health and population registers to obtain information regarding prescription drugs, ASD diagnosis, and health and socioeconomic status. There were 1.5 % of cases and 0.7 % of controls exposed to SSRIs during the pregnancy period, and higher effect estimates observed with longer use. We found evidence that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
119
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
119
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the included studies point to a linkage between SSRIs and ASD, with almost all published studies pointing to increases in risk even if in individual studies the increase is not significant [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the included studies point to a linkage between SSRIs and ASD, with almost all published studies pointing to increases in risk even if in individual studies the increase is not significant [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 Fourth, Shi and Li propose that an alternative approach would be to conduct sensitivity analyses wherein the chosen study is replaced with an excluded study. However, given that both Sørensen et al 5 and Gidaya et al 6 had incomplete control for confounding by indication, the results would be less robust. In fact, Hviid et al 4 was the only study, of 8 evaluated, that had adequate control for distorting influences.…”
Section: Dr Brown and Colleagues Replymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Third, Shi and Li question our exclusion of Gidaya et al, 6 since this study would have been included in pooled estimates for casecontrol studies, rather than cohort studies along with Hviid et al 4 We maintain that inclusion of both studies would have resulted in "duplication" of Danish study subjects 3 ; any bias in these data would have unduly influenced conclusions in a given analysis. We prioritized Hviid et al because of their superior control for confounding by indication; their mental illness variables included not just depression, anxiety, and schizophrenia but other potential indications as well, such as personality disorders and eating disorders.…”
Section: Dr Brown and Colleagues Replymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations