2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-014-1365-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue Border Enhancement by inversion recovery MRI at 7.0 Tesla

Abstract: This technique provides a new type of image contrast and has several possible applications in basic neuroscience, neurogenetic research, and clinical practice, as it could improve the detection power of MRI in the characterization of cortical malformations, enhance the contour of small anatomical structures of interest, and facilitate cortical segmentation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, MP2 + INV1 alone revealed gray matter increase in the area around the right amygdala, which is concordant to the clinical hypothesis. Improved performance by adding INV1 is in line with recent studies, which show that lesion detection could be enhanced by highlighting GM–WM boundaries (Costagli et al, ; Mougin et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this case, MP2 + INV1 alone revealed gray matter increase in the area around the right amygdala, which is concordant to the clinical hypothesis. Improved performance by adding INV1 is in line with recent studies, which show that lesion detection could be enhanced by highlighting GM–WM boundaries (Costagli et al, ; Mougin et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The most likely reason for this is the “dark rim” of hypointense signal at the GM–WM junction. This “dark rim” has also been observed in the previous studies at 7 T using acquisition techniques such as null point imaging and tissue border enhancement by inversion recovery, facilitating enhanced visualization of tissue boundaries of interests (Costagli et al, ; Mougin et al, ). This effect is likely due to similar longitudinal magnetizations of GM and WM but with opposite polarities (Pitiot, Totman, & Gowland, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This effect is achieved by setting imaging parameters so that the neighboring tissues have magnetization with equal magnitude but out of phase; therefore, the voxels containing a mixture of each tissue (ie, the tissue interface) possess minimal net signal. 37 Therefore, the hypointense line-marking tissue interface produced by TBE does not reflect any specific fiber structure. Details of imaging parameters for 3T and 7T imaging are shown in On-line Table 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a dedicated epilepsy research MRI protocol including the following sequences: 3D T1W FSPGR, 3D susceptibility-weighted angiography (SWAN), 2D T 2 *-weighted targeted dual-echo gradientrecalled echo (GRE), 2D T2W FSE, 2D gray-white matter tissue border enhancement (TBE) FSE-IR. 24 GRE and TBE sequences were targeted based on the localization of the SOZ. Since July 2014, 3D magnetization-prepared (MP)-FLAIR sequence 25 was included in the protocol.…”
Section: Mri Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%