Buccal bone deficiency in fresh extraction sockets: a prospective single cohort study

Abstract

Findings from this study showed that xenograft and PRF, used for ridge preservation of the extraction sockets with buccal bone plate dehiscence in the esthetic zone, can be considered effective in repairing bone defects before implant placement. The secondary soft tissue healing over the grafted sockets did not compromise bone formation; moreover, the soft tissue level and the width of keratinized gingiva showed a significant improvement over time.

Alveolar ridge regeneration of damaged extraction sockets using deproteinized porcine versus bovine bone minerals: A randomized clinical trial

“…Previous clinical studies19 of alveolar ridge preservation in intact extraction sockets have found minimal changes in the horizontal and vertical dimensions by grafting xenogenous and allogenous bone substitutes, with small ranges for each value (around 1 mm in most of these studies). Another single‐cohort clinical study5 of grafting at damaged extraction sockets found minimal changes in dimensions along with small variations, which was comparable to the results obtained for intact extraction sockets. While both of these previous studies were similarly based on indications for buccal‐bone‐deficient extraction sockets, the region of the experimental sites differed: the study of Barone et al was limited to the anterior region, whereas that of Scheyer et al included extraction sites in the posterior region.…”

“…This situation has prompted studies into extending the indications of extraction‐socket grafting,5, 6 as well as the use of biomaterials in these techniques 7, 8. Barone et al demonstrated that the horizontal dimension of the alveolar ridge could be maintained after grafting biomaterials with coverage by a collagen membrane in buccal‐bone‐deficient extraction sockets in a single cohort study 5.…”

“…This situation has prompted studies into extending the indications of extraction‐socket grafting,5, 6 as well as the use of biomaterials in these techniques 7, 8. Barone et al demonstrated that the horizontal dimension of the alveolar ridge could be maintained after grafting biomaterials with coverage by a collagen membrane in buccal‐bone‐deficient extraction sockets in a single cohort study 5. Lee et al also showed dimensional augmentation radiographically and successful new bone formation histologically by grafting bone substitutes and coverage with a collagen membrane in damaged extraction sockets in a preclinical animal model 6.…”

Ridge regeneration of damaged extraction sockets using rhBMP‐2: an experimental study in canine

“…, Barone et al. ), which, as in the DBBM/Membrane group of this study, enables preservation of the alveolar bone dimensions and successful bone formation. On the other hand, the addition of rhBMP‐2 resulted in greater new bone formation compared to the DBBM group, such that it became comparable to that in the DBBM/Membrane group.…”

Management of post-extractional alveolar socket with mineralized plasmatic matrix before implant placement: a case report

“…in treating full or partial buccal bone defects of fresh extraction sockets in the esthetic zone showed that xenograft and PRF can be considered effective in repairing bone defects before implant placement. Moreover, they observed that the secondary soft tissue healing over the grafted sockets did not compromise bone formation [22].According to a study by Cagasan and al. It was observed that the concentrated growth factor had positive effects on implant stabilization.…”