2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.revsto.2014.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytoponction ganglionnaire cervicale : facteurs influençant le taux d’échec

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a review by Rammeh et al [ 3 ], FNAC for head and neck masses was inconclusive in 17.7% of cases, while literature review found a rate range of 3%–30% [ 4 , 5 ]. This rate largely depends on the experience of cytotechnologists and cytopathologists [ 4 , 5 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a review by Rammeh et al [ 3 ], FNAC for head and neck masses was inconclusive in 17.7% of cases, while literature review found a rate range of 3%–30% [ 4 , 5 ]. This rate largely depends on the experience of cytotechnologists and cytopathologists [ 4 , 5 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a review by Rammeh et al [ 3 ], FNAC for head and neck masses was inconclusive in 17.7% of cases, while literature review found a rate range of 3%–30% [ 4 , 5 ]. This rate largely depends on the experience of cytotechnologists and cytopathologists [ 4 , 5 ]. There are fewer inconclusive cases when experienced cytopathologists perform the procedure, evaluate the samples, and recognize inadequate aspirates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%