2014
DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry with a novel antibody to detect small T-antigen expressions of Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV)

Abstract: BackgroundApproximately 80% of Merkel cell carcinomas (MCCs) harbor Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) which monoclonally integrates into the genome and has prognostic significance. The presence or absence of MCPyV is usually diagnosed using CM2B4 immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MCPyV-large T antigen (LT) protein. However, this method poses a risk of misdiagnosis.MethodsIn this study, we determined MCPyV infection in MCCs using real-time PCR for MCPyV-LT DNA and prepared 16 cases of MCPyV-DNA-positive and -negati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, it is also possible that this case represents a CK20 negative MCC and that the unclear pathobiology of MCPyV‐negative MCC may correlate with INSM1 expression (or lack thereof). Up to 20% of MCC lack detectable Merkel cell polyoma virus, and are instead associated with a spectrum of genomic changes possibly related to solar damage …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, it is also possible that this case represents a CK20 negative MCC and that the unclear pathobiology of MCPyV‐negative MCC may correlate with INSM1 expression (or lack thereof). Up to 20% of MCC lack detectable Merkel cell polyoma virus, and are instead associated with a spectrum of genomic changes possibly related to solar damage …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, CM2B4 has been shown to have limited sensitivity relative to qPCR (14,31). Other methods that have also been reported in the literature include fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and IsHyb ISH (32)(33)(34). However, the interpretation/reporting of FISH results can be challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study using Ab3, a novel LTAg antibody purported to be more sensitive than other antibodies, reported MCV positivity in an unexpected 97 % of MCC tumors [27]; however, these findings have not been replicated by other laboratories. Newer methods have recently been developed for MCV detection, including in situ hybridization and an antibody to sTAg, which may be more sensitive than CM2B4 staining alone [28]. With many test options having varying claims of sensitivity and specificity, comparative studies and establishing a gold standard for MCV detection are needed to more accurately stratify patients for clinical investigations.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Work-upmentioning
confidence: 99%