2014
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoding the massive genome of loblolly pine using haploid DNA and novel assembly strategies

Abstract: BackgroundThe size and complexity of conifer genomes has, until now, prevented full genome sequencing and assembly. The large research community and economic importance of loblolly pine, Pinus taeda L., made it an early candidate for reference sequence determination.ResultsWe develop a novel strategy to sequence the genome of loblolly pine that combines unique aspects of pine reproductive biology and genome assembly methodology. We use a whole genome shotgun approach relying primarily on next generation sequen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

9
456
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 442 publications
(472 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
9
456
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Silver birch, B. pendula, is a pioneer species in boreal forests of Eurasia. Flowering of the species can be artificially accelerated 4 , giving it an advantage over other tree species with published genome sequences (such as poplar 5 , spruce 6 , and pine 7 ) for the optimization of fiber and biomass production.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silver birch, B. pendula, is a pioneer species in boreal forests of Eurasia. Flowering of the species can be artificially accelerated 4 , giving it an advantage over other tree species with published genome sequences (such as poplar 5 , spruce 6 , and pine 7 ) for the optimization of fiber and biomass production.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the variation in quantitative traits explained by individual SNP markers is generally low and rarely exceeds 5% (Dillon et al ., 2010; Guerra et al ., 2013), consistent with multigenic control (Evans et al ., 2014) and the relatively shallow genomic sampling in most studies to date (< 1% and 10% of estimated gene coding loci per genome) (Nystedt et al ., 2013; Neale et al ., 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, several possible hypotheses have been put forward that place gnetophytes as sister to (1) Pinaceae ('Gnepine' hypothesis); (2) cupressophytes ('Gnecup' hypothesis); (3) all conifers ('Gnetifer' hypothesis); (4) all other gymnosperms; or (5) all seed plants 9 . Currently, the emerging consensus, based on both older and more recent studies, and recently released data from the 1KP initiative (see https://sites.google.com/a/ualberta.ca/onekp/, and Wickett et al 8 ), indicates that gnetophytes are sister to, or within, the conifers.So far, the availability of whole genome sequences for gymnosperms has been limited to conifers (specifically to Pinaceae) [10][11][12][13] and G. biloba 14 , with no whole genome assemblies available for the two remaining major seed plant lineages-cycads and gnetophytes. This deficiency, together with the conflicting phylogenetic evidence for relationships among these groups, is impeding our understanding of genome evolution across all seed plants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the majority of individual repeat types (repeat clusters in RepeatExplorer) were shown to be species specific (containing Illumina reads from just one species, data not shown). The species-specific nature of the repeat profiles probably reflects the long estimated divergence times between species (for example, the two Gnetum species are likely to have diverged between approximately 25 Ma and 75 Ma) 17,18 .Previously, it was reported from conifers and G. biloba that LTRRTs have accumulated steadily over the last approximately 25 Ma, especially between 16 and 24 Ma, a process contributing to their large genome sizes 11,12,14 . This interpretation is consistent with the data here (Supplementary Table 10), which show that most LTR-RTs in conifers are intact (solo LTR/intact LTR ratio ranged from 0.16:1 to 0.72:1, Supplementary Table 10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%