“…The tongue has a vital role in oral feeding 37 . Ingested food is carried to the molar region by tongue retraction and rotation 38 . Once mastication starts, the tongue moves laterally and rotates to place the chewed food onto the occlusal surface in each chewing cycle 39 .…”
Background
Stroke patients often suffer from dysphagia during their recovery. We hypothesised that subacute stroke patients with dysphagia had more deteriorated oral health status including muscle strength and motor function.
Objective
Quantitatively investigate oral health status and identify associations with oral feeding status in stroke patients admitted to a convalescent rehabilitation unit.
Methods
We prospectively recruited 187 stroke patients admitted to a convalescent rehabilitation unit. Oral feeding status was examined using the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), and the cohort was divided into three groups based on FOIS score as non‐oral feeding (FOIS‐123; 22 patients), dysphagic diet (FOIS‐45; 74 patients), and regular diet (FOIS‐67; 91 patients) groups. Activities of daily living (ADL) were assessed with the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Oral health status was measured quantitatively in six oral function parameters and Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT), and differences according to the FOIS, age and FIM were statistically tested.
Results
In bivariate analysis, two parameters, tongue pressure and tongue‐lip motor functions were significantly higher in the regular diet group than in the other groups (P < .01). Gross OHAT score was also significantly better in the regular diet group than in the other groups (P < .01). These significant associations mostly remained in the multiple model after adjusting for age and FIM.
Conclusion
This study suggests that, amongst oral health status, tongue strength and motor function, as well as OHAT score, may have strong associations with oral feeding status in subacute stroke patients at convalescent rehabilitation units regardless of ADL levels.
“…The tongue has a vital role in oral feeding 37 . Ingested food is carried to the molar region by tongue retraction and rotation 38 . Once mastication starts, the tongue moves laterally and rotates to place the chewed food onto the occlusal surface in each chewing cycle 39 .…”
Background
Stroke patients often suffer from dysphagia during their recovery. We hypothesised that subacute stroke patients with dysphagia had more deteriorated oral health status including muscle strength and motor function.
Objective
Quantitatively investigate oral health status and identify associations with oral feeding status in stroke patients admitted to a convalescent rehabilitation unit.
Methods
We prospectively recruited 187 stroke patients admitted to a convalescent rehabilitation unit. Oral feeding status was examined using the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), and the cohort was divided into three groups based on FOIS score as non‐oral feeding (FOIS‐123; 22 patients), dysphagic diet (FOIS‐45; 74 patients), and regular diet (FOIS‐67; 91 patients) groups. Activities of daily living (ADL) were assessed with the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Oral health status was measured quantitatively in six oral function parameters and Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT), and differences according to the FOIS, age and FIM were statistically tested.
Results
In bivariate analysis, two parameters, tongue pressure and tongue‐lip motor functions were significantly higher in the regular diet group than in the other groups (P < .01). Gross OHAT score was also significantly better in the regular diet group than in the other groups (P < .01). These significant associations mostly remained in the multiple model after adjusting for age and FIM.
Conclusion
This study suggests that, amongst oral health status, tongue strength and motor function, as well as OHAT score, may have strong associations with oral feeding status in subacute stroke patients at convalescent rehabilitation units regardless of ADL levels.
“…The tongue also rotates to push the food bolus onto the occlusal surfaces. Stage I transport can be observed with VFS in lateral [19, 31, 32] and AP projections [14, 33]. During stage I transport, the mandible opened and the tongue and hyoid bone moved posteriorly and inferiorly.…”
Food oral processing and pharyngeal food passage cannot be observed directly from the outside of the body without instrumental methods. Videofluoroscopy (x-ray video recording) reveals the movement of oropharyngeal anatomical structures in two dimensions. By adding a radiopaque contrast medium, the motion and shape of the food bolus can be also visualized, providing critical information about the mechanisms of eating, drinking, and swallowing. For quantitative analysis of the kinematics of oral food processing, radiopaque markers are attached to the teeth, tongue or soft palate. This approach permits kinematic analysis with a variety of textures and consistencies, both solid and liquid. Fundamental mechanisms of food oral processing are clearly observed with videofluoroscopy in lateral and anteroposterior projections.
“…The Process Model of Feeding (Hiiemae et al, 1996; Hiiemae & Palmer, 1999; Palmer, 1997) describes 2-stages of antero-posterior movements of the bolus prior to swallowing, termed Stage I and Stage II transport. Stage I transport is the relatively immediate movement of solid food from the anterior oral cavity to the post-canine region and occlusal surfaces of the lower teeth (Mikushi, Seki, Brodsky, Matsuo & Palmer, 2014), and is followed by mastication. Stage II transport (St2Tr), is the propulsion of triturated food to the oropharynx for bolus formation and storage prior to swallowing (Matsuo & Palmer, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although St2Tr is considered normal behavior while consuming solid foods (Jean, 2001; Kahrilas, Dodds, Dent, Logemann & Shaker, 1988; Palmer, 1998; Palmer, Hiiemae, Matsuo & Haishima, 2007; Saitoh, 2007), the neural control of St2Tr and its relationship to food has received limited attention (Hayashi et al, 2013; Inokuchi et al, 2014; Mikushi et al, 2014; Palmer et al, 2007; Taniguchi et al, 2013). …”
Objective
When eating solids, stage II transport (St2Tr) propels triturated food into the pharynx for bolus formation and storage before swallowing. Although the existence of St2Tr is acknowledged, the reason for its existence remains unclear. Understanding it may facilitate development of food appropriate for individuals with dysphagia. The purpose of this study was to explore how measures of duration of eating and swallowing affect the number of St2Tr cycles.
Design
Videofluorography was performed on 13 healthy subjects eating 6-g squares of banana, tofu, and cookies. Measurements included the number of St2Tr cycles, duration of processing (from food entering the mouth to onset of swallowing), pre-upper esophageal sphincter (UES) transit duration (from onset of swallowing to onset of UES transit), UES transit duration (leading edge to trailing edge passing the UES), and total sequence duration (from onset of swallowing to terminal swallow). Principal component (PC) analysis was used to identify factors affecting the number of St2Tr cycles. Analysis of covariance was performed using the 1st PC as an independent variable for predicting the number of St2Tr cycles.
Results
All four duration measures were significantly positively correlated with the number of St2Tr cycles. Analysis revealed two orthogonal PCs with variable loading. The 1st PC was a function of the timing variables. The 2nd PC was a function of the number of swallows.
Conclusions
The number of St2Tr cycles was associated with measures of food transit duration and was greater with harder foods before processing and more viscous foods just before swallowing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.